Well, I'm not a programmer either, but I would love to try compiling a recent CVS build of DOSBox. (By the way, I am now running Sim Farm and Sim Ant on Win 3.1 on the binary DOSBox 0.65 in VGA resolution and they both run well except for the choppy sound.) In addition to trying the DOSBox 0.65 …

You could be right. Oh, well. However, I've just installed an old Windows game called Multimedia Pool on my Mac/DOSBox/Win 3.1, and it works just great. I think I'll start hunting down more of those old games I remember. This could be addicting . . .

Hi, I have a Mac G4 PowerPC with a 733 MHz processor and DOSBox version 0.65 installed on it. I installed Windows 3.1 in DOSBox as in here: http://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?t=9405 and the Soundblaster 16 drivers for Win 3.1 as in here: http://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?t=9600&highlight=windows …

I couldn't say for sure, but I don't think so, because I've copied this same Word 5.0 onto about five DOS and Windows computers and it has worked fine in DOS, Win 95 and 98, and the Win XP DOS emulator. I still have an ancient 286 laptop with horrible, dim CGA graphics that Word 5.0 is running on.

Hi, I have DOSBox 0.65 installed on a Mac G4 733 MHz PowerPC and on a 1.2 MHz G5 PowerPC iMac, and also DOSBox 0.63 installed on a Debian Linux computer (800 MHz x86). I installed DOSBox for two main reasons: 1) to run Wolfenstein (works great), and, more importantly, to run Microsoft Word 5.0. Word …