VOGONS

Common searches


Search results

Display options

Re: DOSBox Feature Request Thread

Also, I think it is stupid to not use the latest version just because you don't like something as minimal as a splash screen. I mean, really? Why is a splash screen something you don't like? I don't understand. Hopefully this answers your question if you're a real DOS user like myself and …

Re: DOSBOX for Windows 3.1

Or any modern version of Windows, if one doesn't like Linux. Windows-to-Go is supported since Win8.1. Granted that limits the choices of flash drive a bit, but gives a consistent experience. Now of all the worst Windows OSes to mention there is some sliver of hope in your answer. A WTG would be an …

Re: DOSBOX for Windows 3.1

Thank You. (And I thought to be invisible for others, due to my "cryptic" language use.) So, here the conclusion -- it was not at all cryptic once people just take time to read. It is just interesting topic to me since I used the win3.x on AMD 450MHz machine (win3.x and with DOS 7.1 with some FAT32 …

Re: DOSBOX for Windows 3.1

What you outline is easier done with a linux system. Especially as this takes the load of working with USB, audio and graphics drivers. Abd more stability... While that might be true of Linux I find it much easier to work in DOS and sticking with the FAT/FAT32 type setup and creating the bootable …

Re: DOSBOX for Windows 3.1

Perhaps he means that -- the programs under the DOS window which can use the soundcards supported in a windows environment? The programs under win3.x DOS window cant use soundcard and (that window was left buggy even for win98se). @95DOSBOX !! Once upon a time I asked the developers to add the …

Re: DOSBOX for Windows 3.1

kids these days and their unrealistic warped perspectives on computer and software history........ Thanks for the shade if that was directed towards me. Probably a bit too old to be labeled a "kid" but I already have a firm grasp on computer software and hardware having run a computer store when …

Re: PCI or PCI Express Sound Card for DOS Sound Blaster Sound Effects working on Intel Sandy Bridge Z68 or newer chipsets

Is there any PCI express cards with native dos drivers? hacked or otherwise? Chinny22, I have not tested any successfully yet (hacked or otherwise). Finding legacy PCI sound cards that will work properly on modern chipsets would be the first step in testing. Then looking for the same chipset and …

DOSBox Older Source Code Pre v0.50

"Old dosbox versions 0.50-0.73 source + binary(x86)" Thanks for the nudge Dominus I guess I missed it. I looked back harder this time I had to use 7-zip to examine the other .tar.gz files to locate the source code folder found in: dosbox-0.50.tar.gz\dosbox-0.50.tar\dosbox-0.50\src\ Just so I …

Re: DOSBox Compilation Guides

It's possible Harekiet or Qbix have the source for those older versions, I believe they weren't using sourceforge before that. I doubt there would be anything to gain by going back that far as compatibility on both guest and host the latest ver of DOSBox is better. I'm not a coder like yourself so …

DosBox Source Code All Versions Links

Don't use 0.72 is the least invasive method. Or you learn how to compile DOSBox yourself. You really really don't need to match your virtual drive letters with your system's letters. Well Dominus v0.72 was the last version that didn't have the splash screen so I stuck with it all these years. I …

Re: DOSBox Compilation Guides

Official DOSBox (0.74-2 and current SVN) supports 95 and NT4 with Active Desktop. My builds support NT 3.50, NT 3.51, 95 and NT without Active Desktop. (Still haven't submitted patches yet) Lowest SDL 1.2.13 supports is 95a (unknown about betas) and NT 3.50 (Have to disable fullscreen support). ( …

Re: DOSBox Feature Request Thread

Qbix, you caught me in mid post. I have finished revising my post. Scenario 1 Quick Fix change to: Virtual Drive Letter B: Can you provide a hexedit method to replace all instances of Z: to B: which would be the least invasive work around?

DOSBOX for Windows 3.1

Looking for people who can assist in compiling DOSBOX to run under Windows 3.1 Standard. I'll be doing some testing on a P4 with an ISA Sound Card since modern systems are going to be more difficult to test sound output on this operating system. Later the goal will be adapt the onboard Realtek Audio …

Re: DOSBox Compilation Guides

COMPILING DOSBOX Windows NT 3.50 DOSBox should work as long as correct msvcrt.dll is used and modifications to SDL to display fullscreen are made. Need to test. Also copy winmm.dll from NT3.51 Windows NT 3.10: DOSBox will not work. SDL 1.2.15 not supported on NT 3.10 MUNT Windows 98 This thread …

Page 1 of 17