Yes, Windows 98 runs slower without the dynamic core. As I said though, the dynamic core doesn't quite handle page faults the way they need to be handled. Windows 95 and higher require the emulation to support task switching even during a page fault, which dynamic core (and anything other than …

Yes. I had to remove the dynamic core code, because it has slowly bitrotted over the years. It's also not compatible with the way emulation and page fault handling works now. Even if you did manage to run Windows 98 in DOSBox-X today, the dynamic core would mishandle page faults in a way that would …

Thanks for the great effort toward dosbox-x development. However Windows 98 runs very slow on dosbox-x pulled from github on 2018-01-31, although I have set core=dynamic I got this message when I run make: checking whether x86 dynamic cpu core will be enabled... no is that what makes windows 98 runs …