Re: I found a 775 to 478 adapter
Posted on 2024-05-24, 13:49
Found the manual. Barely readable, but it looks like the jumpers are for FSB setting. https://blog.naver.com/spc9999/220932988338 If I'm reading it right. Default on on 800fsb off off
Re: Someone got xp sp3 running on a 486
Posted on 2024-05-24, 12:16
Heh. That link would have probably saved them so much time. Just knowing that nt4/5 had 2 code paths would have been a godsend. Though, it makes me wonder if you could just decompile it and recompile with different settings and achieve the same result.
Re: Juiced (2005) - How to remove "Juiced requires virtual memory to be enabled" via hex editing?
Posted on 2024-05-24, 10:15
Re: I found a 775 to 478 adapter
Posted on 2024-05-24, 08:20
Usually voltage or fsb
Re: I found a 775 to 478 adapter
Posted on 2024-05-24, 07:17
I believe the chipset protocol is basically the same. Maybe a bit faster (Eg 133 vs 100) but the same language. The only issue would be microcode, which comes down to the board maker, or a bios mod.
Re: I found a 775 to 478 adapter
Posted on 2024-05-24, 06:08
Interesting. But my mind misinterpreted what I was reading for a moment, and I thought "Socket 775 CPU in my P4P 800? That would be awesome!" Then I read it again. It's theoretically possible. What you might be able to find that does exist is a 479>478 adapter. Actually, thinking about it, I …
Someone got xp sp3 running on a 486
Posted on 2024-05-24, 05:56
https://msfn.org/board/topic/186080-xp-running-on-a-486-cpu/ Figured someone here is crazy enough to want to try it out
Re: Dos problems
Posted on 2024-05-24, 03:57
Hmm. Fair enough. It might be simpler to not use the unofficial dos 7.1, but instead just use the standard windows 98 fdisk, format, and sys commands. Then copy the dos files from a 98 install's c:\windows\command into c:\dos Then copy your working config/autoexec Which is essentially what the …
Re: Dos problems
Posted on 2024-05-24, 01:23
Why do you want 7.1 anyway? What's wrong with 6.22? I'm not aware of any major feature improvements.
Re: DOS 4.0 from source to system
Posted on 2024-05-23, 23:40
Seems weird to disable it, but whatever. Glad it's working. Now you've made the first, you've chicken and egged it, right? You can use 4.0 sys now.
Re: Which sites issue IP and device based bans?
Posted on 2024-05-23, 09:51
Re: Asrock 775Dual VSTA & Core4Dual thread
Posted on 2024-05-23, 08:40
Looks like the drivers aren't modded. To check, read the inf file and look for your card.
Re: smallest computer that can run windows XP with supported hardware (especially video card?)
Posted on 2024-05-23, 07:18
I would like to have a small computer to run old XP games; nothing fancy, not planning to run Crysis or anything like that, but more like early 2000 games at 1280x1024 resolution or 1600x1200 at most. https://www.parkytowers.me.uk/thin/ Good place to start. Eg I built a 98 + voodoo box from this: …
Re: DOS 4.0 from source to system
Posted on 2024-05-23, 05:02
Re: DOS 4.0 from source to system
Posted on 2024-05-23, 02:59
Are you sure /oem doesn't work? It's still in there. Typo? Case sensitive? https://github.com/FDOS/sys/blob/master/docs/sys.txt
Re: Bought these (retro) hardware today
Posted on 2024-05-23, 00:32
Ah bugger. Wish the replies weren't on a different screen on mobile!
Re: Bought these (retro) hardware today
Posted on 2024-05-22, 23:21
Large auction sites always set their prices to wealthy countries with more disposable income and that creates those inflated prices. You find the same with any global market. You can get Australian cheese in much of Asia. It costs about the same +shipping as in Australia though. Most new computer …
Re: Army Ranger: Mogadishu - How to get rid of the error "Failed to intialize the renderer" via hex editing
Posted on 2024-05-22, 15:51
Lol you again. "game x has an error. Tell me the offset to hex edit it because I'm a 1337 game h4xx0r"
Re: Windows Me - "Misunderstood Edition"
Posted on 2024-05-22, 14:53
ElectroSoldier wrote on 2024-05-22, 12:14: Youre making several key ass umptions there. Classy. ElectroSoldier wrote on 2024-05-22, 12:14: Real MS DOS support is something we are interested in talking about nearly a quarter of a century later.. Dosbox first release: 2002. Nuff said.
Re: DOS 4.0 from source to system
Posted on 2024-05-22, 14:18
Page 2 of 15