thanks guys for hints so far! now cycles=6000 seems to be working too! now i am using core_simple and some minor optimizations! anyway...how can i know that my changes really make things faster? i only sense it by making values of cycles higher and see if programs speeds up or not...anybetter way?

yes it does run almost good on pdas with 400mhz but my target is smartphone with around 100mhz speed! about dynamic core what is idea behind it? is it possible to write it for arm cpus?

yes thanks for hint.... i was wondering so why the code in x86 was that small!! but i am compiling for arm using embedded visual c and i looked its assembly code and it was very huge jumps! so i think it doesnt transfers it into jump table! is the speed of converting them into jump table great? …

Hi.... i am working on a port to smartphone (windows ce) devices. anything is working but it is very slow! i am using core_normal.... ny the way what are diffrences? using core_full or core_simple? can i gain any speed by using core_simple? also about core_normal,i was thinking maybe transfering …