I just read the sticky about posts for game-specific problems to be posted elsewhere. Sorry about that.

On a separate issue, I'm unable to load the game unless I run the game's setup.exe first and test sound & music. otherwise I get this: DOSBox version 0.74 Copyright 2002-2010 DOSBox Team, published under GNU GPL. --- CONFIG:Loading primary settings from config file /home/antic/.dosbox/blood.conf …

Dosbox 0.74, I haven't tweaked any config files so everything is stock. What's going on here?

well at least it's a fluke, anyway. is the GOG version of stonekeep in any way updated from the retail 1.2 version? (or does GOG not actually modify the games they acquire?)

yup, two different saves and the problem is still there

What is GOG? I had two savess near that point, and if I recall correctly they both crashed. I'll double check here in a bit.

oh and by the way, this is in my dosbox autoexec.bat for stonekeep (you might need to do the same for my savegame): set files = 70 mount e /usr/share/games/dos/sk/skcd -t cdrom

anyone can download my savegame from here: http://eoc.serveftp.org:9090/share/sksave.zip just extract it into your "stonekeep/savegame/" directory. load it up, step forward, attack the green slime monster under the water (healing yourself now and again, "I" for inventory), and as soon as he dies, …

I wanted to post this as a dosbox bug report and offer up more debug info (I'm a programmer, myself) but was unable to find any such resource on the website. Dosbox 0.74 Stonekeep v1.2 retail cd Gentoo Linux after configuration, StoneKeep ran flawlessly until one particular part of the game and it …

Dominus wrote: Thank god it's not your decision when I post. penis Dominus wrote: Nope, certainly not all. penis Dominus wrote: good penis

I think they need a communications director (and no, I'm not volunteering!) to handle news updates and release packaging, so they can continue to focus on development. I wouldn't mind helping with posting news on the site or packaging if thats really a hastle for the development team. I guess this …

Again, I don't get it. All your ramblings seem to me like you haven't really informed yourself before posting. Latest CVS release 2003? WTF? Just reading the first post in the forum you posted should have informed you a bit more. And where do you get the rule that open source should release as …

the latest cvs build is from 2003? I don't get it. Really. It's not like there has been a release in November 2004 or several status reports on the homepage since then OR just browsing this part of the forum answers this question. Really. At what site did you look to get the impression that nothing …

then again, I have a hard time trusting sourceforge.nets activity percentage system. I'm the leader and only developer of the project Shade, and I havent touched that source in months, but it claims my activity percentile for last week was 97%. though it says overall percentage is 3%. 0 cvs adds and …

yeah, 99% activity on sourceforge. I just noticed antoher project called "DosBox Optimized" seems like a waste of effort unless they're contributing to the DosBox project itself.

thats so good to hear 😀

the latest cvs build is from 2003? did the developers die or something? why has development halted on this project, and how can I jion the development team? 😀