Re: EtherDFS on OpenWRT. Doable?
Posted on 2024-03-06, 22:17
Thanks. I will definitely search for these hints This seems to be the way then: https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-developer/tool … in/crosscompile
Re: EtherDFS on OpenWRT. Doable?
Posted on 2024-03-06, 21:57
No younger right the server side. Thanks. Let me dive deeper than here. Br
Re: EtherDFS on OpenWRT. Doable?
Posted on 2024-03-06, 21:15
Ah that will be a bit too heavy for my knowledge. I also noticed that there is no ARM source for etherDFS. But I would need this on my router. I m not quite sure if this would work via kernel rebuilt Thanks anyway
Re: ISO on\for DOS?
Posted on 2024-03-06, 14:15
Rav wrote on 2024-03-06, 13:30: I mount my iso from my 128GB etherdfs share, no issue here. I would also do etherDFS but i can’t find an arm built for running on openwrt/router hardware.
EtherDFS on OpenWRT. Doable?
Posted on 2024-03-06, 06:24
Hello all, Did anyone succeed in running EtherDFS on Openwrt? I didn’t manage it. It’s not part of the package inventory. Maybe it works when sideloding? Any ideas are welcome. Thanks so much
Re: ISO on\for DOS?
Posted on 2024-03-06, 05:03
Wow fantastic. Thanks so much
Re: Cirrus logic 5426 - win 3.1 driver in 95?
Posted on 2024-03-05, 22:34
Just double checked the directx6 content and the updated drivers seem to be just for gd5429 and upwards.
Re: ISO on\for DOS?
Posted on 2024-03-05, 22:06
Hi all, question: mounting iso works well. But unfortunately only from a hdd. The tool won’t allow you to mount iso from a network share. (Smb). Do you know about any solution to mount ISOs from a network share? It really takes time to copy full ISOs each time to a hdd first (on isa)
Re: Performance of IDE DOM partly worse than spin HDD
Posted on 2024-03-05, 21:56
Conclusion: after reinstalling a lot I will switch back to my modern hdd. There is really little to non performance improvements because of the very low DOM/CF access times on a 386sx. Installations take same time as the cpu is bottlenecking expanding files etc. Furthermore having no noise at all …
Re: Performance of IDE DOM partly worse than spin HDD
Posted on 2024-03-05, 20:39
Thanks a lot for your detailed input. Two points here: 1. from major experiences back in the days I would only recommend smartdrv over all alternatives. Mem isn’t a problem currently 2. in particular at XUB you can read that on slow pcs with fast hdd incl large hdd caches the smartdrv could even …
Re: Performance of IDE DOM partly worse than spin HDD
Posted on 2024-03-05, 19:27
Sorry I just have the 8kb rom burned and cannot change to the large rom anymore. I read that only the large rom version can show up the information. But anyway thanks
Re: Performance of IDE DOM partly worse than spin HDD
Posted on 2024-03-05, 14:30
I tested the same with a ide2cf adapter and the results are more or less the same as with the DOM. Maybe both don’t support that multi sector transfer
Re: Performance of IDE DOM partly worse than spin HDD
Posted on 2024-03-05, 14:29
Here the latest screenshot
Re: Performance of IDE DOM partly worse than spin HDD
Posted on 2024-03-04, 21:59
Ah thanks also
Re: Performance of IDE DOM partly worse than spin HDD
Posted on 2024-03-04, 21:57
It’s at 13,75 MHz I usually expect get 1300KB/s -1600KB/s on an 8MHz bus, so 2600KB/s on a 13,75 MHz bus sounds about right to me. And speedsys is reporting 3600KB/s on that same system with the Maxtor IDE? That's awesome. Can you post a screen shot? On older screenshot with an older drive already …
Re: Performance of IDE DOM partly worse than spin HDD
Posted on 2024-03-04, 21:51
Ahaaa. That might be a point.
Re: Performance of IDE DOM partly worse than spin HDD
Posted on 2024-03-04, 21:48
Hi, will do tomorrow. Diskmeter and 4_speed are confirming the numbers. If anyone has an idea about why the dom is slower I’d also appreciate hints. The only point I would see is the hdd cache that’s not available on the DOM. Maybe that can make a difference. But I doubt that as well as the no-cache …
Re: Performance of IDE DOM partly worse than spin HDD
Posted on 2024-03-04, 21:37
It’s at 13,75 MHz
Re: Performance of IDE DOM partly worse than spin HDD
Posted on 2024-03-04, 21:29
Sorry, I relaced it by KByte/s. My fault. Yes shadowing is enabled for my xtide rom. With shadowing disabled performance won’t pass 1300kbyte/s. Tested programs: - speedsys - nu si8 - diskmeter - 4_speed Btw the 2600kbyte are also the maximum for buffered read speed on the DOM. What is indeee much …
Re: Performance differences HDD Controller vs. soundcard controller
Posted on 2024-03-04, 21:10
Just for confirmation: I tested both setups and there is indeed no difference in benchmark results. Ciao
Page 7 of 22