Re: DosBlaster 2.0 - shell extension for DosBox
Posted on 2006-10-26, 18:04
Agreed. Soon as I saw that Avatar I definately wasn`t thinkin about dosbox 🤣.
Re: Savestates?
Posted on 2006-09-19, 00:47
Good to see that you guys are looking into it, in either case. Save States is something we`d all love to see at some stage.
Re: Savestates?
Posted on 2006-09-16, 10:39
If some research was done into how a psp saves everything into temporary memory so that if the psp is turned off then on again it picks up where it left off, that may give you the answers you seek. Not completely obviously as its an entirely different system, but I think it would be something worth …
Re: About TCP/IP
Posted on 2006-04-17, 04:31
Well having windows working in dosbox was never required for dos games to work, but support for it was put into dosbox from an emulation perspective. Dont see anything wrong with adding tcp/ip.
Re: Cpu resource
Posted on 2006-03-06, 09:37
Didn`t happen to install SP2 recently did you? If so it has NOTHING to do with dosbox. Go into task manager and end "Explorer.exe" from the processes list, sounds crazy I know but it is the root of your problem and you`ll only ever have to do that once. Every time you start your computer from then …
Re: New CyclesAuto feature
Posted on 2006-02-13, 12:01
So what does CyclesAuto do, for the total noobs like me? I`m guessing it sets the most appropriate cycles per game you play via dosbox?
Re: overclocking
Posted on 2006-02-05, 08:53
Wheres the "any key" ? 😜
Re: Math constants patch
Posted on 2006-02-02, 06:36
Where would that be used?
Re: QFG3 (and general Sierra issues)
Posted on 2006-01-22, 03:32
Hmm
Re: Feature Request: MNG Capture
Posted on 2005-12-22, 03:07
What in the hell is MNG??
Re: DOSbox killed my machine...
Posted on 2005-12-22, 03:05
All your base are belong to us
Re: Symbian Binary
Posted on 2005-12-12, 12:20
"I want to run windows on my mobile" HAHAHAHHHHAHHHAHA Aprils not till a few months time.
Re: Graphics performance boost
Posted on 2005-12-08, 02:01
Being 1 person who uses the Doomsday engine weekly, I`ve got to point out that the graphics in that are absolutely fucking beautiful (mind my french) without any effect on overall game speed. Heres a few screenshots from the Doom64 Total conversion done in the Doomsday engine which best show off how …
Re: Graphics performance boost
Posted on 2005-12-04, 15:21
rcblanke: Further testing: C&C - You were dead right on C&C. Dynamic core was the culprit there. Switching to normal core fixed that one. This game ran no better or worse with the scaler changes. Still too slow for me to play. And upping the cycles caused too much sound stuttering for me to enjoy …
System Shock
Posted on 2005-12-04, 03:25
Hey All This game has worked in all cvs versions until recent versions. Apon running cdshock.bat I receive the following error: Error code 2004 Resource Error Could not find palette. Try setting FILES=30 in config.sys
Re: Graphics performance boost
Posted on 2005-12-04, 03:20
I`ll do a quick test of the 2 non working games now with the AEP version. [edit] Same exact errors in the AEP build. Must be something else causing the problems.
Re: Graphics performance boost
Posted on 2005-12-03, 17:52
Kronuz: After reading the last 8 pages I JUST HAD to test out the latest cvs build to test out your changes to dosbox, and all I can is WOW. I`d become so used to games running ok but not fast. But now they run practicly perfect. Those that worked in dosbox anyways. I tested out my main 4 games that …
Re: time for 0.64 ?
Posted on 2005-11-26, 03:55
Yes but rather than having to go through 3-5 sites just to see a list of new features in the cvs when you could just have a list on the main dosbox site was my point.
Re: time for 0.64 ?
Posted on 2005-11-25, 01:30
Would be nice if there was some kindof cvs features list page on the main site. Sometimes you just want to know whats been added rather than download a new version of the cvs.
Re: Dosbox on Ubuntu
Posted on 2005-11-20, 06:16
What in the hell is Ubuntu?
Page 2 of 11