Re: To end the AMD v. Intel debate.
Posted on 2019-12-19, 16:15
Re: To end the AMD v. Intel debate.
Posted on 2019-12-19, 13:48
Re: To end the AMD v. Intel debate.
Posted on 2019-12-07, 10:59
Re: To end the AMD v. Intel debate.
Posted on 2019-12-07, 08:27
i5 9600K is generally faster than R5 3600 in gaming: https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/3527-am … nchmark-in-2019
Re: To end the AMD v. Intel debate.
Posted on 2019-12-04, 15:02
I shelled out 1000€ for my now aging i7-5960x cpu and now a first generation Ryzen 3 cpu is even faster when playing csgo. Ryzen 3000? Possible. 1st gen Ryzen 3 (1200 or 1300X)? I don't think so. He says 1st gen Ryzen and you go directly to 1200? Some weird logic there. Ryzen 1800X would match …
Re: To end the AMD v. Intel debate.
Posted on 2019-12-04, 11:09
Yeah. For example, Zen CPUs are vulnerable to Variant 4 (speculative store bypass), but older (and slower) CPUs like Phenom II are not.
Re: Tron: Evolution SecuROM DRM expiration
Posted on 2019-12-04, 10:52
Re: To end the AMD v. Intel debate.
Posted on 2019-12-04, 10:34
eL_PuSHeR wrote: I shelled out 1000€ for my now aging i7-5960x cpu and now a first generation Ryzen 3 cpu is even faster when playing csgo. Ryzen 3000? Possible. 1st gen Ryzen 3 (1200 or 1300X)? I don't think so.
Re: To end the AMD v. Intel debate.
Posted on 2019-12-04, 00:08
DNSDies wrote: Firtasik's charts had a $1100 Intel CPU topping the charts of a few games with Ryzen 3800x about 7-8FPS behind it, which costs about $300. i5 9600K costs about $200 and it beats 3800x (about $370) in some games.
Re: What music are you listening to?
Posted on 2019-12-03, 19:28
Re: Windows 98 SE & internet connection via WiFi?
Posted on 2019-12-03, 19:08
Sure.
Re: To end the AMD v. Intel debate.
Posted on 2019-12-03, 18:58
Intel is still the gaming king: https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/intel_core_i9_10980xe_processor_review,21.html Ryzen 3800x is within 10% of that for 30% of the price. I can take the $650 I saved going ryzen and get another 2080rtx and go SLI. Also, that i9 runs at TDP rating of 165 watts. A …
Re: 64-bit dynamic_x86 (patch)
Posted on 2019-12-03, 17:22
timedemo demo1 My own build (MinGW64), DOSBox SVN r4267 (x64) ~197 fps jmarsh's SVN DOSBox (x64) ~195 fps Official DOSBox 0.74-3 (x32) ~153 fps EmuCR DOSBox SVN r4267 (x32) ~152 fps Yesterplay80's DOSBox SVN r4267 (x32) ~147 fps r4296 and the newest patch: ~206 fps
Re: Windows 98 SE & internet connection via WiFi?
Posted on 2019-12-03, 16:56
WPA2 under Windows 98 isn't much secure due to the KRACK vulnerability.
Re: To end the AMD v. Intel debate.
Posted on 2019-12-03, 16:47
Intel is still the gaming king: https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/intel_c … _review,21.html
Re: Timmy Joe PC Tech: RTX 2080ti vs Max Payne - 20 yrs later @ 4k 1000 FPS
Posted on 2019-11-02, 16:24
Yeah, it looks awful due to stretching. Solution: https://thirteenag.github.io/wfp#maxpayne
Re: Motocross Madness 2 terrain textures
Posted on 2019-10-30, 18:31
noli44 wrote: It only seems compatible with dgVoodoo v2.42 up to v2.54, with any newer version all textures are blank and the menu is really messed up. Radeon bug, I guess.
Re: OmniMIDI: A MIDI synthesizer forked from "BASSMIDI Driver" by kode54
Posted on 2019-10-26, 16:10
Well, it seems that VirtualMIDISynth is the way to go.
Re: 64-bit dynamic_x86 (patch)
Posted on 2019-10-05, 21:06
Yeah, that 64-bit boost in my benchmark must be purely coincidental. The 32-bit counterparts would be "the fastest" of course. I hope you appreciate this elaborate comment as well.
Re: 64-bit dynamic_x86 (patch)
Posted on 2019-10-05, 16:44
Thanks for your elaborate correction. Let's say, in my experience during testing, I found the 32bit build still being faster than the 64bit build. This was on OS X. Windows 10 1809 x64, Quake Shareware v1.06 timedemo demo1 My own build (MinGW64), DOSBox SVN r4267 (x64) ~197 fps jmarsh's SVN DOSBox …
Page 2 of 25