Re: Ykhwong's Daum Build and OSX
Posted on 2014-01-25, 13:21
The wrapper has the same error. It it something unique to your osx build. Official build, Dominus' SVN, and the win32 version of your build in wine all work fine.
Re: Ykhwong's Daum Build and OSX
Posted on 2014-01-25, 11:47
Still getting bus error 10 in Mavericks...
Re: Ykhwong's Daum Build and OSX
Posted on 2014-01-23, 02:39
Is it possible to build using the prebuilt SDL.framework & sdl_net.framework runtimes from the SDL site instead of the bare dylibs? Also, someone said x11 isn't required as SDL can use the native GUI. No X11 is obviously preferable, but if it really is needed, can't the official xquartz install be …
Re: Ykhwong's Daum Build and OSX
Posted on 2014-01-21, 01:25
Hopefully this thread will result in an improved Ykhwong build on Git for everyone to hack on. Maybe even an XCode project that "just builds".
Re: Ykhwong's Daum Build and OSX
Posted on 2014-01-20, 06:26
.app files are not supposed to be self modifying, so the conf file must not be put inside. Application Support is also not the proper location (a config file is not really a supporting file). The MT32 roms should be put there though. Configuration files should go in ~/Library/Preferences
Re: Ykhwong's Daum Build and OSX
Posted on 2014-01-16, 06:41
A static compile isn't even needed. Plenty of OSX apps put dylibs (or frameworks if they are more attuned to OSX development) in the .app. The real problem is that Ykhwong's zip of libs is very messy (a bunch of symlinks and some libs that seem to not be used - I think he just zipped his entire /opt …
Re: Ykhwong's Daum Build and OSX
Posted on 2014-01-14, 10:10
Red: Ykhwong's zip of libraries contains several libphysfs.* files, just make a copy of one of the big ones and rename it to libphysfs.1.dylib. libphysfs.1.dylib is supposed to just be a symlink to the big file anyways, but it seems to be broken. As for properly compiling a 32bit version yourself …
Re: Ykhwong's Daum Build and OSX
Posted on 2014-01-14, 08:35
Jarvik7, thanks. I'll try and write here about your advice. I totally agree with you that this DosBox version requires to be packed. It's not "Apple way" to put libs and frameworks outside the application. I also tried Wineskin and win32 version and it works very cool and there is no need to make …
Re: Ykhwong's Daum Build and OSX
Posted on 2014-01-14, 07:18
Your "wrong architecture" error is probably caused by you installing a 64bit copy of the lib while dosbox is searching for a 32bit copy. You can replace libphysfs.1.dylib (1kb) with a copy of the other libphysfs dylib (>200k) in the zip and it will work. At least, it did for me before I did a clean …
Re: Looking for old DOS Game
Posted on 2014-01-08, 01:18
Re: Minimal install for DOSBox/95 gaming
Posted on 2014-01-02, 09:44
Truth is using win95B, I am using win95C.
Re: DOSBox SVN Daum: Faults, Fixes, and The Future (64-bit and Beyond)
Posted on 2013-12-31, 03:20
Why aren't patches being added to the main branch instead of a multitude of forks?
Re: DOSBox SVN Daum: Faults, Fixes, and The Future (64-bit and Beyond)
Posted on 2013-12-28, 06:54
The current build is no longer working for me. The same build was working fine previously, but the other day I reformatted my computer and did a clean install of Mavericks to replace the OX I'd been doing upgrade installs of since Tiger. Now, when I run ./dosbox, I just get a "Bus Error 10" error in …
Re: Minimal install for DOSBox/95 gaming
Posted on 2013-12-28, 01:28
Oh yeah, I guess those are on the boot disk. As for the registry, it'll take a lot of work to make it by hand. I don't know how much of it is pregenerated on the cd. I'll leave it up to someone else.
Re: Minimal install for DOSBox/95 gaming
Posted on 2013-12-27, 05:47
I'll take a jab at automating it using the resource kit etc. at some point, but today is my last day of work before holidays and I'll probably be relatively busy when I get back. I did throw my hdd image up on Google drive in case I get the urge to hack on it from home, but I'd rather be …
Re: Minimal install for DOSBox/95 gaming
Posted on 2013-12-27, 01:59
Whose posts? The links? I think they are doing a regular install and then deleting stuff by hand. I tried out one of them (the smallest) but it instantly broke, as it says to delete the registry completely. It may be possible to do that, but it requires configuration, not a simple file list. Also, …
Re: PCEm. Another PC emulator.
Posted on 2013-12-26, 05:25
Some people in this thread a few pages back dumped their own awe32.
Re: Minimal install for DOSBox/95 gaming
Posted on 2013-12-26, 01:05
Installing Win9x is not a simple matter of copying files to the correct locations (there is a lot of registry & .ini generation). Doing everything could be written into a set of .inf files you drop into /WIN95/ along with the needed addon files... Why reinvent the wheel (re-implement setup.exe in …
Re: Minimal install for DOSBox/95 gaming
Posted on 2013-12-24, 15:11
Better off playing 3.x games in 3.x though
Re: Minimal install for DOSBox/95 gaming
Posted on 2013-12-24, 12:37
Is there some list of games that use wing? I don't remember ever using it past win 3.x
Page 3 of 5