VOGONS

Common searches


Search results

Display options

Re: DOSBox-X branch

The problem may not be related to just the difference in precision, fpu_instructions.h is a very minimal x87 implementation that doesn't always take FP exceptions when it should or set flags correctly for many instructions. Using "long double" won't fix that. Intel made a utility to test for correct …

PowerPC Dynamic Recompiler (patch)

So I started this over 5 years ago, left it unfinished for a few years and now started from scratch and got it into a fit state for submitting... This patch adds a dynamic recompiler for 32-bit PowerPC, based on the existing dynrec framework. I've only tested it on a wii but there should be no …

Re: Date & Time Mismatch?

FeedingDragon wrote: What I was semi-asking was.... Isn't there a file library in standard C++ (the language DOSBox code "appears" to be written in,) that has file date/time commands? There is not, that is precisely the problem.

Re: Date & Time Mismatch?

but thats kind weird though, in *nix realm we have "touch" program, on dos realm, i remember Norton Utilitiess have a program called "FD.exe" or "File Date", which thanks to compatibility, also works on 32-bit windows regardless the underlying FileSystem (FAT/NTFS). there also "touch" for windows …

Re: Date & Time Mismatch?

Most file I/O functions are not different on every platform... stat(), open(), read(), write() etc. There is no standard equivalent function to set the timestamp of a file to a specific value, most platforms don't even have their own function for it.

Re: FastDosbox 1.6

In addition, I ran # apt-get source dosbox Then performed a diff with fastdosbox's source. There are countless changes, especially in the CPU core. There really aren't, if you ignore whitespace changes (and compare against say, dosbox SVN r3783 since fastdosbox is missing a lot of more recent …

Re: FastDosbox 1.6

But if that's true, why then is it so much faster on benchmarks like topbench even when I use the fastdosbox-CVS.conf setting in my dosbox.conf? If fastdosbox only changed configuration options, they would run at the same speed. Those two statements are contrary to each other. If you can take the …

Re: FastDosbox 1.6

Pickle wrote: I wonder if people are paying $1 to have the dynamic core turned on for them... I think you're right... there's barely any noteworthy changes in the source code, besides making the default core "dynamic" instead of "auto".

Re: Upscaling DosBox recordings (ZMBV Errors)

The issue is not Virtualdub (which is "modern" - latest release was last October), it's an issue with installing the codec - right-click on the "Install movie codec" entry on the start menu and choose "Run as administrator". Then use 32-bit (not 64-bit) virtualdub for editing.

Page 65 of 66