Re: Post pic's of your onboard video benchmark
Posted on 2016-09-20, 22:48
My G31 https://d1ebmxcfh8bf9c.cloudfront.net/u40311/ … id_1352680.jpeg
Re: P-III Tualatin 1.4GHz overclocking
Posted on 2016-07-24, 18:36
What about PCI and AGP frequences when overclocking? I can see PCI bus increasing with OC, but how that effects AGP bus? What would be good VGA cards for OCing? There aren't PCI fix so PCI and AGP frequency will go over default frequency. I have more than 80 agp cards and i spent hours during my …
Re: P-III Tualatin 1.4GHz overclocking
Posted on 2016-07-23, 00:42
I have a differrent way of thinking about overclocking... If you have reached 2.1ghz with liquid cooling that's good for you but in my experience it's too high. To archieve this frequency is necessary SS cooling. BGA sdr are bad and Intel 815 is able to run well over 210mhz If you will show to us …
Re: P-III Tualatin 1.4GHz overclocking
Posted on 2016-07-22, 20:22
You need a good batch like always 😉 2.1ghz stable? I don't think so... 2.1ghz is different to 2.4ghz... you don't need sdr binning... Read my 2 last posts.
Re: Best Socket A (462) Motherboard?
Posted on 2016-07-22, 20:17
Pair of 256mb*2 bh-5/bh-6 for overclock or Hynix D43 at default settings
Re: P-III Tualatin 1.4GHz overclocking
Posted on 2016-07-21, 04:31
This is not air cooled 😉 Anyway this type of example is useless. There are Extreme situation, not dayle use overclock. I Know gradus he spent an unbelievable amount of hours and lots of money (more than 200 sdram stick) to reach these types of scores. ( made with extreme cooling).
Re: P-III Tualatin 1.4GHz overclocking
Posted on 2016-07-19, 08:50
Hello, I'm thinking on trying how far can I overclock a Tualatin-S 1.4GHz. I already have a few processors but no good motherboard. At the moment I have one QDI with i815 chipset and FSB goes "only" up to 166MHz. That gives top speed of 1743MHz. Not bad, but I want more :D I'd want high FSB and …
Re: AMD XP rig ideas
Posted on 2016-04-28, 07:01
First we have to know game's period you want to play. If i were you, i would use Athlon 462 platform only for late win98's games to prevent performance issue. Anyway the main problem: all 462 CPUs doesn't have SSE2 instructions and this is a big problem especially if you run them with ATI-AMD Radeon …
Re: Question about the Tualatin pin mod
Posted on 2016-03-04, 05:43
Hi Ace i made this mod some years ago http://pipux.net/index.php?id=15 Only problem is that it seams to have problems with tualatin@1,475-1,45 not with 1,5v I made it on my asus cusl2 (same your board) with one Celeron 1.3 A1@1.5v; I insulated only those 3 pins and still work like a rock 😀
Re: My 3DMark01 Mega Thread
Posted on 2016-03-03, 10:54
I think you misunderstood what I was saying. Yes, on a lot of computers Win98se is -better- for actual usage. But for the point of making high scores in 3dmark 2001se, no matter what hardware it is, XP is going to be the fastest, in the terms of benchmarks only. I'm not talking about normal usage. …
Re: My 3DMark01 Mega Thread
Posted on 2016-03-02, 17:24
@up OK. But did U do it on non-VM Win 98 SE (like me) ? Windows 98 SE is also a serious performance penalty for 3dmark 2001se ... XP is where it's fastest in all computers. I'm not agree there are some situation in wich is better win2000 or win98se Some example: Slot 370 tualatin or coppermine + …
Re: AMD K6-2 550 vs Celeron 333
Posted on 2016-02-28, 21:41
Celeron 300a slot@450mhz does mean that you push it at 100*4,5 and i think that with these settings you can't compare an amd k6-3+. They work in different way. If i were you, i would use a pentium II 450 100*4,5 instead. The Celeron 300 was a famous overclocker. It defaulted to 66Mhz FSB and 4.5 …
Re: AMD K6-2 550 vs Celeron 333
Posted on 2016-02-28, 15:46
i pitted k6-3+550 against celeron300a oc 450 in 3 benchmarks: superpi, 3dmark01 and quake3. the celeron won all 3 tests. in quake3 its around 50% faster, the other two tests just saw ~5% difference but remember that the celeron has 100mhz lower clock. I have some questions about your benchmarks …
Re: Nvidia GeForce 6800XT AGP won't work with 98
Posted on 2016-02-18, 23:53
meljor wrote: My 6800LE, 6800GT and 6800 ultra all work fine in 98se, i THINK (not sure) the XT was a later card and indeed used a bridge chip. You wrote well... 6800GS and XT were made some months later. They use pci-agp bridge
Re: Best mobo for P4 Prescott
Posted on 2016-02-18, 20:50
Asus p4c800 has bad vrm mosfet... There are a lor of problema with them. Asus p4p800 has better vrm. If i were you, i would buy an abit 478 865 or 875 There are more stable
Re: Nvidia GeForce 6800XT AGP won't work with 98
Posted on 2016-02-18, 20:47
mockingbird wrote: Use an older driver... Something like version 45. Too old... Detonator 4x.xx and 5x.xx dont run with geforce 6x00 you new need Forceware 6x00 Series
Re: Nvidia GeForce 6800XT AGP won't work with 98
Posted on 2016-02-18, 20:44
You need one GeForce without pci-agp bridge You can try to turno off agp fast write and other agp settings with rivatuner
Re: Good Pentium 3 Board with ISA and Tualatin Support?
Posted on 2015-12-21, 18:18
Chaintech 6VIA5T it's 370 micro atx,has one isa slot with VIA 694T so tualatin ready 😉 i've bought one some years ago, runs well and stable, no overclock settings but for me it's not a problem, i don't like to use overclocked parts for gaming. I hope that is the same even for you
Re: 7600GS 512mb with Win98SE
Posted on 2015-12-21, 17:53
matze79 wrote: For Soulreaver 2, apply patch 1.02 and change HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Crystal Dynamics\Soul Reaver 2\1.00.00\DisableVShader to 1 . And here you go. thanks for this tweak 😉 anyway i'm refering to Soul Reaver 1 made in 1999
Re: 7600GS 512mb with Win98SE
Posted on 2015-12-21, 17:46
This might be of interest to the Radeon X800 / X850 cards. These are the Catalyst® Version 6.2 for Windows ME Release Notes: The Catalyst® software suite is designed to support the following ATI product family: Radeon® 9800 series Radeon® 9000 series Radeon® 9700 series Radeon® 8500 series Radeon® …
Page 2 of 5