VOGONS

Common searches


Search results

Display options

Re: 3 (+3 more) retro battle stations

@pshipkov Apologies about the delay, but I did some more testing. I used a PGA132 SXL-40, like the one pictured here (actually, this is one of the two I have in my possession now). I don't have an SXL2-50, but the SXL-40 is the same pretty much; I don't know if it can do 55MHz, but it can do 50MHz …

Re: 3 (+3 more) retro battle stations

Alright, I pulled out my MS-3124 after storing it away for some time and decided to give it a go with a PGA132 SXL-40 for the heck of it. The board worked pretty well, all things told. I didn't notice any stability issues, although CTCM1.6n hung. CTCM1.5b seemed okay, which is generally a measure of …

Re: 3 (+3 more) retro battle stations

While I have a brief moment, I wanted to add something about the MS-3124. I’ve had this board for a while and I can indeed confirm the difficulties with SXL CPUs. DLC parts also do not work well, if at all. However, this board is very strange insofar as it isn’t truly capable of taking a PGA168 CPU. …

Re: 3 (+3 more) retro battle stations

I’ve been thinking about this issue and wondering if there’s something else at play. The OPTi 495SLC and 495XLC are, from what I understand, pre-bug fixed versions of the OPTi 495SX. The -SX is a little bit different, in that it can seemingly run much tighter cache and DRAM timings out of the box. I …

Re: 3 (+3 more) retro battle stations

You're quite welcome! I'm glad that the datasheet proved useful. The thing about the 50MHz, 66MHz, and 80MHz options is that this board is using them as clock-doubled inputs, divided internally by the IMI SC425, so as to feed 25MHz, 33MHz, and 40MHz FSBs for 386-class CPUs. From what I gather, most …

Re: 3 (+3 more) retro battle stations

My pleasure! I have v1.2 of this board, equipped identically but for the chipset--mine uses the OPTi 495XLC, which-from what I can tell-only adds support for Cyrix-specific L1 WB features for their 486S and 486DX2/4 series with the non-standard, non-Intel pinout. The jumper layout and other ICs are …

Re: 3 (+3 more) retro battle stations

Glad to be of service! I apologize that it took so long to get the numbers squared. The board itself proved to be part of the issue, in that it just had so many quirks and problems. Getting this board setup to where it worked well was 90-95% of the battle; that's not to speak discouragingly of the …

Re: 3 (+3 more) retro battle stations

@pshipkov Excellent work on the 386 hardware. Your results are invaluable and your time is much appreciated! Thank you for this Herculean effort-it has been quite exciting, to say the least, and I am very interested in seeing where your next stop is hardware-wise! Thank you for doing this indeed! :D …

Re: 3 (+3 more) retro battle stations

These dates really make the situation even funnier! I am kind of surprised that Viatris never launched a trademark suit and shut this down! After all, Dolby sued PC Chips for their HX Pro chipset, which was just their renaming of the ALi Aladdin III. As far as I am aware, this is not exactly VIA's …

Re: 3 (+3 more) retro battle stations

@AnonymousCoward Agreed. I don't know why, but it seems that OPTi always pushed integration as a "premium" marketing feature. I guess they had good sales guys haha. --- @BitWrangler I'm excited to see where this beast goes. Hopefully you can wake it up and scare away any evil spirits preventing POST …

Re: 3 (+3 more) retro battle stations

Efar has a somewhat interesting history as a re-labeler. From what I gather, based on the work of the guys at The Retro Web, it seems that, for example, the Efar 802GL is a clone (?) of the SiS471 . Note the board linked here that has two variants on the same PCB. One is equipped with the 802GL and …

Page 2 of 11