Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-18, 04:09
[EDIT] Mispost.
Re: Test: Running Formula 1 on a Rendition Verité V2200
Posted on 2023-11-15, 23:57
And one more: https://1drv.ms/u/s!As-dKk-N73dSln4Mo-Zu9Ad0nTvO MD5: 1519851605218ba2b9967dd0e0e64924
Re: Test: Running Formula 1 on a Rendition Verité V2200
Posted on 2023-11-15, 23:16
One final attempt before I call it quits for tonight: https://1drv.ms/u/s!As-dKk-N73dSln0Mo-Zu9Ad0nTvO MD5: af9b66500c0ca64445c356b63a69e5b3
Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-15, 21:16
RaVeN-05 wrote on 2023-11-15, 20:01: click on screenshoots to load larger image, look as head and body at distance That's quite a bit a better.
Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-15, 20:26
That's the same. Now vidmode 0x15 = 21. Need to look that up and what CX=09CF is; Thanks guys! What does a V2k return? v2200 results Pre-entry AX 0000, BX 0030, CX 0006, DX DB43, ES 1337, DI 00F9 On exit AX 0015, BX 0000, CX 0A2C, DX C000, ES 1337, DI 00F9 ES:DS+01 = FF00 ES:DS+02 = B036 ES:DS+03 = …
Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-15, 19:52
my friend discovered one of two undocumented vquake console cvars: d_amip 1/0 (default 1) 1-use mipmaps on models, 0-dont use which is better quality . d_sync 1/0 (default 1) - still unknown , maybe its vsync , seems nothing changes. Nice. I can't see a difference in those two screenshots at …
Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-15, 19:24
I recall you once told that the latest Nvidia driver has issues with RReady, has it been fixed? It was because Steam was running. Shutting it down magically fixed RReady/DxWnd with Interstate '76/Nitro/Mech Warrior 2. I think I posted it on the DxWnd thread on SourceForce. BTW I fixed a lock up …
Re: Test: Running Formula 1 on a Rendition Verité V2200
Posted on 2023-11-15, 19:21
https://1drv.ms/u/s!As-dKk-N73dSlnwTLGYZxuntdgPh?e=RPy1zN MD5: 21a9b6fdf6544a792639184d2dcc152e I've ported across one paletted texture change from RReady into this. It's not a straight wrapper for VL_SetSrcStride_. RReady used to crash after this as well starting a quick race. I don't know whether …
Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-15, 14:19
Thanks Agentbsod. Still playing around with dosbox. Does anyone know if Verité boards used the same io ports under dos as windows? I suppose there's no way of knowing under dos.
Re: Test: Running Formula 1 on a Rendition Verité V2200
Posted on 2023-11-15, 12:46
I've reviewed the code, possibly introduced new bugs (hopefully not). See whether the lockup is still there: https://1drv.ms/u/s!As-dKk-N73dSlnsMo-Zu9Ad0nTvO MD5: 3bdb604f2db89c1e472123372db319ed
Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-15, 04:45
Bugs people are complaining about need to be fixed: https://1drv.ms/u/s!As-dKk-N73dSlnoMo-Zu9Ad0nTvO MD5: 46c91c66a1052eb13b3cc0c5f4933d40 - Alpha release auto-downloader has textual error messages on failure. (Windows 7 SP1 users may need the Win7 TLS 1.2 patch/reg keys for the download to work) - …
Re: Test: Running Formula 1 on a Rendition Verité V2200
Posted on 2023-11-14, 16:13
Thanks chuky. If you look for the text massaged callback, the command buffer ids are there (on entry and exit). Between two massaged callbacks there's a V_IssueCmdBufferAsync, so the buffer ids appear to be ok. The other thing is there's less stuff in the command buffer now. It issues faster. One …
Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-14, 15:58
The problem with the diagnostic output in SetMode was this (in case anyone's interested): 1) Real mode address was used (segment * 16 + offset). Rendition uses protected mode addressing (segment * 65536 + offset) 2) DS:CX+16 = 00001414 The first four digits shouldn't have been zero.
Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-14, 15:30
I got a copy, thanks. Cart racing, as a few members pointed out to me. ICR2 is impossible to come by., but should be identical
Re: Test: Running Formula 1 on a Rendition Verité V2200
Posted on 2023-11-14, 11:10
One more with cmdbuffer id logging (OR it may spectacularly crash): https://1drv.ms/u/s!As-dKk-N73dSlnnM_HTNjV566uqM?e=lXmP2x MD5: e598dc78c4a7758c27fa8bc8762437c7
Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-14, 10:05
Ok got it going. This should definitely work: https://1drv.ms/u/s!As-dKk-N73dSlne9NrazjMm8uqpt?e=qHy6bd MD5: 0dcdd7b0451aff80aefaba49e9053cc1 Forgot I needed %lX instead of %X for 32 bit ints unlike on Windows.
Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-14, 09:01
There's a problem with my code. Turbo C 1.0 is having serious issues with bit shifting a 16 value (converted to unsigned long int) to the left by 16. It's clearly defined as an unsigned long int (32 bit). But the upper 16 bits are 0.
Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-14, 07:34
And again: https://1drv.ms/u/s!As-dKk-N73dSlnbmX4pwdZCfyVm7?e=P5DwUc MD5: 3f3fd62b7d76e3de630a63d26d7e28dc I was hoping for a _v_verite_info structure there. Doesn't look like it.
Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-14, 04:48
One more: https://1drv.ms/u/s!As-dKk-N73dSlnXbmH1pFnYfUUSf?e=dyqiuT MD5: b2fcd2e30425bfccbe6ebc22fb76b4aa I think cx returns a pointer to a structure.
Re: RReady (Rendition Verite wrapper) Test Build (Alpha 1)
Posted on 2023-11-14, 03:41
Cheers! [EDIT] Hold off. I'll have a better build in a bit. Try this instead: https://1drv.ms/u/s!As-dKk-N73dSlnQMeqcWym6cqir2?e=eg7UkX MD5: 9b0c77a0d21db7fe6ee2d9f43833b9e4 You'll have to redirect output to a file. There's too much stuff here. [/EDIT] I forgot to include the on-entry status to see …
Page 65 of 78