Weird SDL incompatibility?

Posted on 2012-09-27, 12:06

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... no …

---

Re: Munt Reloaded - Development

Posted on 2012-09-27, 01:05

by

by Serious Callers Only

in MT-32 Development

in MT-32 Development

I'm using linux... exclusively. BTW, dosbox doesn't compile with ubuntu's sdl otherwise i wouldn't even tried to mention this. I'd just build it and place it on my ppa. Drivers? WTH... i don't want to install weird linux midi drivers and mess with ports to use dosbox. Please, some sanity, just do …

---

Re: Munt Reloaded - Development

Posted on 2012-09-26, 21:38

by

by Serious Callers Only

in MT-32 Development

in MT-32 Development

Could dosbox include the mt32 'dynamic linking' patch? It's really, really tiring to start up munt before running games that i configured to use mt32 /don't even know what those are after a while.

---

Re: Anyone got a patched dosbox ppa?

Posted on 2012-07-31, 04:49

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

I read up on the ppa process. Well, it's a bit bullshit, since they want you to build in their server instead of providing a debian file (probably to allow traceability of malicious files). They explicitly forbid any deb packages However this really fucks up projects that don't use buildtools (like …

---

Anyone got a patched dosbox ppa?

Posted on 2012-07-26, 20:28

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Especially with the mt32 patch

---

Re: Java Port

Posted on 2012-07-17, 14:38

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

but wine is not a emulator (it would only run on 86x[-64])

---

Re: Munt Reloaded - Development

Posted on 2011-10-23, 11:56

by

by Serious Callers Only

in MT-32 Development

in MT-32 Development

Can anyone think of a way to do automated testing?

---

Re: DOSBox Compression Issue

Posted on 2011-08-10, 15:32

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

It's a winmount bug, you can't expect devs to support any random hack that changes OS internals.

---

Re: Munt Reloaded - Development

Posted on 2011-07-04, 22:55

by

by Serious Callers Only

in MT-32 Development

in MT-32 Development

Don't bite my head off, but: Was the Colonel Bequest thunder bug above fixed?

---

Re: Munt Reloaded - Development

Posted on 2011-05-14, 03:55

by

by Serious Callers Only

in MT-32 Development

in MT-32 Development

Couldn't the dosbox patch do that before starting a executable from the shell?

---

Re: circad for dos and Dosbox

Posted on 2011-05-09, 23:02

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Games/Apps

in DOSBox Games/Apps

Ib4 wd flame.

---

Re: 3dfx voodoo chip emulation

Posted on 2011-04-16, 12:58

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Also, maybe you should use the F suffix? Just to be sure that your comparing without conversions. if (distance (cother.rgb , chromaKey.rgb) < 0.01F) discard; ... actually, i have no idea if c99 has that.

---

Re: 3dfx voodoo chip emulation

Posted on 2011-04-16, 12:35

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

The floats are 0F-1F or 0F-255F? If it's the second i guess that works fine. (Watch out for -0F like the article says if you care about the IEEE representation when converted to integer though). If it was you producing them, i'd guess a "-0F" would not happen, unless you subtracted zero and zero …

---

Re: 3dfx voodoo chip emulation

Posted on 2011-04-16, 12:02

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

isn't this normally done with delta testing? check this: http://www.cygnus-software.com/papers/compari … t%20numbers.htm

---

Re: 3dfx voodoo chip emulation

Posted on 2011-03-14, 00:51

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Just a quick question, are you going to extend the voodoo support for higher resolutions than the "standard" like some wrappers do? It's mostly a issue for windows 95 games but interstate76 for instance, looks much better like that. Of course, game resolution screen options look confused when you do …

---

Re: Java Port

Posted on 2011-02-16, 20:50

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

If you use netbeans you can add this to get a 3rd party plugin of it (if you use eclipse, they already give it i think and if you use the cmd line, well...). http://deadlock.netbeans.org/hudson/job/sqe/lastStableBuild/artifact/build/full-sqe-updatecenter/updates.xml (add this to the plugins-> …

---

Re: Java Port

Posted on 2011-02-16, 20:17

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Ok i did what i always do in these cases, check out and used findbugs on it. Besides some bit twiddling warnings i'm not qualified to comment on, and some floating point tests not using a elipson: Infinite recursion on Section_prop.Add_path line: tmpentry.entryname[0] != 0xe5 on Drive_fat is …

---

Re: Java Port

Posted on 2011-02-16, 19:49

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Impressive.

---

Re: Java Port

Posted on 2011-02-16, 19:36

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

How can you do a recompiler in java? Some sort of bytecode generation? Or did you skip it. Using the SDL binding right?

---

Re: 3dfx voodoo chip emulation

Posted on 2010-11-29, 19:38

by

by Serious Callers Only

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

These lists, they aren't dependent for the key on a signature (for instance md5 or something) that changes if the exe is edited are they?

---