VOGONS

Search

Common searches

Search results for AMD

Display options

Display options

Re: AMD 486 DX4-100 (WT), Intel 486 DX4-100 (WT) & Intel Pentium Overdrive 83 MHz (WT) performance comparisons

Posted on 2015-05-05, 08:00

And I'm still trying to figure out what you did with that, because I always hit a bottleneck with the BUS and RAM leading to such speeds being unattainable on a vastly superior motherboard... Though I can get within a few percent so it's probably within the margins. POD is indeed likely to be the …

Re: AMD 486 DX4-100 (WT), Intel 486 DX4-100 (WT) & Intel Pentium Overdrive 83 MHz (WT) performance comparisons

Posted on 2015-05-05, 21:20

Is OCing a POD to 100mhz generally OK? Some have done it successfully on here, but I've not been able to do it without issue. It seems to run synthetic benchmarks just fine, as well as the DOOM time demo. However, I cannot get the Quake benchmark to run at all - it just bombs out. This has been the …

Re: AMD 486 DX4-100 (WT), Intel 486 DX4-100 (WT) & Intel Pentium Overdrive 83 MHz (WT) performance comparisons

Posted on 2015-05-05, 21:38

And I'm still trying to figure out what you did with that, because I always hit a bottleneck with the BUS and RAM leading to such speeds being unattainable on a vastly superior motherboard... Though I can get within a few percent so it's probably within the margins. POD is indeed likely to be the …

Re: AMD 486 DX4-100 (WT), Intel 486 DX4-100 (WT) & Intel Pentium Overdrive 83 MHz (WT) performance comparisons

Posted on 2015-05-05, 22:45

Yes, I noted an increase when using VLB on my board too, though employing certain tweaks to the BIOS closes the gap on the PCI a little. As for the turbo switch, how about connecting it to the BUS COCK pins if possible? My board has a row of three-pin headers which proved ideal as I can switch …

Re: Say it ain't so AMD...

Posted on 2015-06-20, 01:21

Honestly, it probably wouldn't be so bad. There GPU division seems to be doing okay so it might be an okay idea to split off the CPU division. It's better that than close down

Re: Say it ain't so AMD...

Posted on 2015-06-20, 16:39

Lets not forget Russian processors as well. The more companies in the game = better for end user. OMG don't kick the dead dog, Russian CPUs are based on 65 nm process, priced several times higher then top-end Intel CPUs and can't cope with Libre Office while running Linux. The way it works in …

Re: Say it ain't so AMD...

Posted on 2015-06-20, 17:16

Lets not forget Russian processors as well. The more companies in the game = better for end user. OMG don't kick the dead dog, Russian CPUs are based on 65 nm process, priced several times higher then top-end Intel CPUs and can't cope with Libre Office while running Linux. The way it works in …

Re: Say it ain't so AMD...

Posted on 2015-06-20, 18:34

in Milliways
Not going in to politics: I do not think beeing competitive is the goal for Russias CPU (and other hardware) development projects. I think its more about the defense and information sector having access to hardware without "undocumented features" they do not know about. You mean so they can have …

Re: Say it ain't so AMD...

Posted on 2015-06-20, 19:59

Not going in to politics: I do not think beeing competitive is the goal for Russias CPU (and other hardware) development projects. I think its more about the defense and information sector having access to hardware without "undocumented features" they do not know about. You mean so they can have …

Re: Say it ain't so AMD...

Posted on 2015-06-21, 03:59

By the way, our plant has Department #1, which protects national secrets. And they are only allowed to use mechanical typewriters. The thing is, "protected" computer would cost a lot of money and would have to be inspected over short periods of time, so why bother 😁

Re: Say it ain't so AMD...

Posted on 2015-06-21, 04:08

By the way, our plant has Department #1, which protects national secrets. And they are only allowed to use mechanical typewriters. The thing is, "protected" computer would cost a lot of money and would have to be inspected over short periods of time, so why bother :D Typewriters LOL A lot of things …

Re: Say it ain't so AMD...

Posted on 2015-06-21, 07:41

in Milliways
Give it some time, it will spark others to start producing as well. In my opinion we should have all had 32core RISC processors by now if Amiga didn't die.

Re: Say it ain't so AMD...

Posted on 2015-06-21, 11:36

in Milliways
By the way, our plant has Department #1, which protects national secrets. And they are only allowed to use mechanical typewriters. The thing is, "protected" computer would cost a lot of money and would have to be inspected over short periods of time, so why bother :D Typewriters LOL A lot of things …

Re: Say it ain't so AMD...

Posted on 2015-06-22, 02:32

in Milliways
Stojke wrote: Give it some time, it will spark others to start producing as well. In my opinion we should have all had 32core RISC processors by now if Amiga didn't die. Funny you should mention that: http://www.adapteva.com/epiphanyiv/

Page 171 of 1268

Go to top of page Go to top of page
Close window
Close window