VOGONS

Common searches


Search results for AMD

Display options

Re: AMD 5x86 @200

He's probably refering to the increase in performance from 160 MHz to 200 MHz. From 133 to 160 give you a boost of 20%. From 160 to 200 gives you an additional boost of 25%. Now 25% may or may not be marginal, depending on your notion, but keep in mind that almost every VLB card requires to set a …

Re: AMD 5x86 @200

Also, normally only one VLB card will work at that speed. If you have more than one VLB card installed, 50 MHz is normally a no-go, as it either doesn't work at all or very unstable. Mine is stable at 3x50 MHz with two VLB cards; a video and a multi i/o. I had to lower the DRAM timings a bit though …

Re: AMD 5x86 @200

My guess would be K5 was seen as a necessity because Socket 5 was hot stuff. The platform was much improved and K5 had the potential to beat Intel. It's just unfortunate that they apparently didn't have the resources to get K5 working in a timely manner. It's doubtful they knew it would be so …

Re: AMD 5x86 @200

I did not find much of a performance increase going from 133mhz to 160mhz. So the performance increase is going to 200mhz will be marginal. The bump from 133 to 160 on the retired 5x86 I had from work back in the days, when my main rig was a Celery 300A@450, a just what was necessary to play music …

Re: AMD 5x86 @200

I have mine(ADZ) booting at 200 and working at 180(tested thoroughly without any error in DOS and Windows). It runs at 180 with just 3.6V and no voltage enables it to run with 200... What is the datecode on that ADZ chip? Is it stable running games in Windows? How many chips did you need to try to …

Re: AMD 5x86 @200

Instead of a 5x86 at 200, if you want to get your fast 486 dose, you can always try a Cyrix MediaGX. I happen to have a MediaGXm 266 that runs happily at 300MHz, made for some interesting comparisons with a Pentium 133 :). Is there a thread on this? Which motherboard are you using for this? None of …

Page 309 of 1678