VOGONS


First post, by beepfish

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I've been wondering whether to buy an Amiga - I missed out first time round, having had a CPC464 at home and then moved on to IBM PCs at work.

The most common and cheapest models seem to be the 500, 600 and 1200. What I can't work out is what's the best one to start with.

The 600 seems a bit narrow and cramped so I was thinking it was between 500 and 1200. The 1200 seems more expandable and of course faster, but does the extra speed affect many games? The lists of games written for the 1200 seems pretty short.

Also don't really understand the difference between AmigaOS and Workbench, but I'll read up on that elsewhere.

Reply 1 of 12, by keropi

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

get an A1200. it has way better expandability, offers an IDE interface and a pcmcia slot to easily transfer files. with a cheap 8MB fastram card you can also run games installed to the HD with the whdload program. when using whdload all game incompatibilities are fixed on the A1200.
you can check amibay.com to seek there answers and the actual machine(s) to buy 😁

🎵 🎧 PCMIDI MPU , OrpheusII , Action Rewind , Megacard and 🎶GoldLib soundcard website

Reply 3 of 12, by Amigaz

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
keropi wrote:

get an A1200. it has way better expandability, offers an IDE interface and a pcmcia slot to easily transfer files. with a cheap 8MB fastram card you can also run games installed to the HD with the whdload program. when using whdload all game incompatibilities are fixed on the A1200.
you can check amibay.com to seek there answers and the actual machine(s) to buy 😁

Couldn't have said it better myself 😉 spot on!

My retro computer stuff: https://lychee.jjserver.net/#16136303902327

Reply 4 of 12, by Barry_Purplelips

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Most Amiga demos and games assume an A500 + WB13. A properly expanded A1200 can give you certain degree of backwards compatibility through whdload, with AGA stuff being more of an extra.

If you can, get either a plain, stock A500 or the most potent A4000T available. The A600 I would not touch with a ten foot pole.

Reply 5 of 12, by F2bnp

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I'd get a 1200 with an HD and 8megs of ram.
WHDLoad really does miracles, although the 500 is much cheaper and will require much less time to set up etc.
However there's a catch, as writing flopies for the 500 is not a simple task. Unless you've got someone who can do that for you, you're in deep shit. I managed to do it by using a serial cable and transferring the image file over to the Amiga and write them on the floppy disk. Took about 8 minutes for each floppy. Yeeeeeeeeeeep, it takes a looooooooooooong time. I'm about 10 years older now... 😜

Reply 7 of 12, by beepfish

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

ermm... thanks for the replies to my long dead thread.🤣 in the meantime i've had a 500+ [yuk, battery leaks] and a 1200hd.

for the 1200 i used whdload and a pcmcia ethernet card, though to get the amiga setup in the first place i had to use an old win95 486 to write floppies. as i recall.

long since sold the amigas due to lack of space and the fact i enjoyed only a few of the games that came with them.

Reply 8 of 12, by MaxWar

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Its actually an interesting thread, probably already chewed through elsewhere but you always have some people ( like me ) who were just too young in the time of the Amiga and now want to have a taste of this fabled machine. Although ive never touched an amiga before, i consider the possibility of obtaining one in the not so far future, from what i have read, i would go with 1200, 4000 is awesome but a tad on the expensive side.

Reply 9 of 12, by DonutKing

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Oh well, if we are going to keep the necro going...

I recently picked up a 500 and 1200, and a 1084S monitor. I'll describe my experience with it thus far.

It came with a box of floppies, unfortunately most of them had deteriorated over the years so I'd get errors trying to use them. I had to give my cleaning floppy quite a workout as the old disks would dirty the heads.
The 500 only has a floppy drive so was pretty much useless without any floppies. Even the original Workbench 1.3 disk it came with was dodgy.

The 500 also had a RAM expansion for the trapdoor slot underneath. This had a battery backed up clock but of course the clock had one of those terrible PCB mount barrel style batteries which had leaked, so first task was to get rid of that. If you get any expansion with a clock be mindful of this.

The 1200 had workbench installed on the hard drive, but of course to get software onto it via floppy you need to put tape over t he notch on your disks and format them on your PC as 720KB. Then the amiga can read them, but you need software to do so. Luckily I had a working floppy with dos-2-dos on it, so I used this to copy utilities I needed such as unzip, LHA, and an ADF image writer.

Basically getting software onto it was a major pain in the arse.
Pretty much all the disks I wrote, seemed ok in the 1200 but the games/demos etc would be glitchy, presumably because of the AGA chipset.
The 500 would get errors reading these disks.

It should also be mentioned that if you format a 1.44MB disk as 720KB or use it in the amiga as an 880kb disk, they are more prone to errors than a true 720KB or 880KB disk.

Thankfully a couple of local amiga enthusiasts came and got me sorted out with a CF card and IDE adapter, with classic workbench with all the utilities installed.
You definitely should look into Classic Workbench if you get a 1200 as it makes things a lot easier however the installation can be quite involved. You also need a working Workbench 3.0 or 3.1 disk to install it - which I didn't have. My workbench floppy had errors.

Once that's up and running you can get a PCMCIA CF or SD card reader, and transfer files to the amiga 1200 that way.

So its been interesting so far. The command line is a lot different to DOS and unix/linux which are the only operating systems I've really used. The manauls I had didn't really explain the commands in any sort of detail and the workbench GUI is quite spartan- not much there if you don't know where to look.

Some of these guys buy accelerator cards and RAM expansions for their Amiga, then use a flickerfixer to run it with a modern LCD monitor, and use it as their primary PC for surfing the web and so on. I don't think I'm that keen on it, and those accelerator boards can be a couple of hundred dollars or more. A bit rich for me I fear.

I'm mostly enjoying downloading demos to run on the Amigas as they are definitely more impressive on authentic era hardware. Most of the games I like are available on PC, although it can be interesting to compare the differences between versions.

Overall its an interesting machine but I wouldn't go too far out of your way to get one.