Originally posted by Unregistered I did use my motherboard's CD, but I used it for the original install as well when everything worked. It's a SiS chipset, plus a couple patches for USB and HyperThreading, then drivers for the onboard peripherals; RAID, sound, LAN. If there's any monitoring software, it's well-hidden; I don't see it in a menu or the process list.
So it sounds like it's off the hook for now...
I've got a couple of partitions on this thing I haven't used yet.
Just remember that Win9x wants the 1st partition on the drive. You may be able to trick it into using a different partition, but doing so is just asking for trouble.
I may just do a Windows 98 partition or use the existing one on my other computer (98SE/2000Pro dual boot).
You probably can do that, but you will probably need a third-party boot-menu program unless you're reinstalling XP.
You can also try hooking up the 2nd drive and letting XP "detect" the Win9x install (using the command-line level tools available from the "Repair" option on the CD). That would make me a little nervous...I've gotten a few "unexpected results" doing that kind of thing...
I was hoping I could get the majority running under XP.
Hope for the best, prepare for the worst. There are some titles that simply will not run on an NT OS. Just about anything that uses VCPI, for example (Privateer, Strike Commander, Pacific Strike, Wing Commander: Armada) isn't going to work without:
1) a source port (like those from DOOM...dream on)
2) "Full PC Emulation"
The 2nd is more likely, and we'll get there eventually, but for many titles, it's just not ready yet.
Win9x gives you a fallback mode, a weapon against Murphy's Law.
I'd like to have something in the Start Menu that'll load a game with all the necessary options/software and run without incident.
For titles that just need VDMSound, it's not a problem. Other's will probably still need tweaking from time-to-time. Fortunately DosBox supports custom batch-file startups, so pain-in-the-butt games can be started up easily, like Nomad.
showthread.php?s=&postid=10188#post10188. Some will always need tinkering...
Maybe I need to make a couple 2gig FAT32 partitions? Wow, I'm going to have a few extra drive letters.
That's another thing I do. After I install Win9x, I created lots of tiny (8Meg) partitions to eat up drive letters. That way, when XP is installed it shows as Drive N:
I then delete the tiny partitions and add their space to the neighboring partitions. Why do this? It keeps my drive letters consistent. If you manage to install Win9x after XP, XP will still call itself C:, and will call the new Win9x partition D: or some other letter. When you boot into Win9x, it's going to call itself C:, causing confusion for any programs shared by the two OS's. By forcing XP to a high-drive letter at install, you minimize this kind of thing from happening. Once the OS is installed, (unlike other partitions in XP) your boot partition drive letter is permanent. Of course, changing drive letters in Win9x is not a viable option.
I also force both OS's to use the same CD-ROM drive letter (H:) to keep program settings consistent.
BTW, if you install XP from the Desktop of Win9x (as a New Installation), it gives you the advanced option of choosing the drive letter for installation. It may let you choose which partition, but it doesn't actually let you choose the letter.