VOGONS


First post, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

So I helped a friend out and got my hands on a 386 sx which I've built up for the 4 hours.

Spec's
INTEL 80386SX-16
2048MB ram
TRIDENT TVGA8900C 256K
Soundblaster 32 with 2mb SIMM expansion
Super I/O card unknown brand
Intel 10BaseT nic
510MB cf
1.44 and 1.2 floppy drives
Dvd-rom connected to sb32 ide port

20200605_154534.jpg
Filename
20200605_154534.jpg
File size
879.87 KiB
Views
1028 views
File license
Public domain

If anyone can help identify the board I'd appreciate it aswell

20200605_150903.jpg
Filename
20200605_150903.jpg
File size
851.87 KiB
Views
1028 views
File license
Public domain

Reply 1 of 14, by appiah4

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

It should be roughly on par with a 286-12 in terms of 16-bit speed. You get to run 386 code with it though, so even better. Run the AWE32 in MT-32 mode and enjoy some Monkey Island 😀

I can't identify the motherboard but that looks like an AT chipset/motherboard to me.

Retronautics: A digital gallery of my retro computers, hardware and projects.

Reply 5 of 14, by Caluser2000

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
candle_86 wrote on 2020-06-06, 16:45:

so i have two banks of GM71C1000-80, giving me a total of 2mb, if i wanted to upgrade the board would would i look for.

I don't see any 30 pin sipp or simm connectors on the mobo so you may reqire a 16 bit isa memory card of some sort. It'd make a good Dos/GeoWorks system as is though.

There's a glitch in the matrix.
A founding member of the 286 appreciation society.
Apparently 32-bit is dead and nobody likes P4s.
Of course, as always, I'm open to correction...😉

Reply 7 of 14, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

For this I was thinking the external header is a 6v so would sticking two coil cells together do the trick, it has no internal battery it was always external.

Reply 8 of 14, by Anonymous Coward

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

GM71C1000-80 is 1mbit memory is it not? Given the number of chips installed, shouldn't you have 4MB?

"Will the highways on the internets become more few?" -Gee Dubya
V'Ger XT|Upgraded AT|Ultimate 386|Super VL/EISA 486|SMP VL/EISA Pentium

Reply 10 of 14, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Landmark compares the system to a 23mhz AT and PC player got 1.2 in slow, fast won't start, Doom averages to 8.7 fps. Alot if tests won't run because my Trident 8900c appearantly isn't vesa compliant

Reply 11 of 14, by appiah4

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

8.7fps in doom on a 386SX-16? Were you running it at matchbox size? Sounds impossible for default view size settings.

Retronautics: A digital gallery of my retro computers, hardware and projects.

Reply 12 of 14, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
appiah4 wrote on 2020-07-21, 08:47:

8.7fps in doom on a 386SX-16? Were you running it at matchbox size? Sounds impossible for default view size settings.

Phil's did bench Doom slow, small view window, lowest settings.

Reply 13 of 14, by appiah4

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
candle_86 wrote on 2020-07-21, 13:12:
appiah4 wrote on 2020-07-21, 08:47:

8.7fps in doom on a 386SX-16? Were you running it at matchbox size? Sounds impossible for default view size settings.

Phil's did bench Doom slow, small view window, lowest settings.

I wish people would stop using this, it's so utterly meaningless..

Retronautics: A digital gallery of my retro computers, hardware and projects.

Reply 14 of 14, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
appiah4 wrote on 2020-07-21, 13:17:
candle_86 wrote on 2020-07-21, 13:12:
appiah4 wrote on 2020-07-21, 08:47:

8.7fps in doom on a 386SX-16? Were you running it at matchbox size? Sounds impossible for default view size settings.

Phil's did bench Doom slow, small view window, lowest settings.

I wish people would stop using this, it's so utterly meaningless..

I disagree it's informative