It seems nice to me. 😎

Whats with the black paint marks above the cube?

you might want to use less screenshots of adventures.
Else a lot of people will recomend scummvm 😀

heh and I doubt you want to use "bugfixes" on promotional material. 😉

Just some of my thougts about it:

• I would recommend using the same sizes for the screenshots. It looks a bit messy like it is now.

• The font for the feature text is very blurry and quite hard to read. Try using a crisper anti-aliasing on them.

• Also the big texts on the bottom of the graphic are a bit thin and have very low contrast in comparison with the grey background. But they have a nice nostalgic touch to them 😀

But I like the approach of some kind of promotional graphics!

Qbix wrote:

you might want to use less screenshots of adventures.
Else a lot of people will recomend scummvm 😀

You should use some Hercules/CGA/EGA/Tandy screenshot too.

Could cheat and use some HQ2X screenshots....but since it's not in CVS that would be cheating. Advmame2x would work tho.

thanks, for the constructive criticysm....i'll take note about size on captures and oldiest greater hits of CGA games for it....also the Font fixes for made more readable....i'll update this thread soon 😉

oks, let's go again....new promo gfx...

That one looks much better, how about another one outlining features rather than bug fixes? Things like:

*Video Capture
*Scaling CPU speeds
*Support for classic sound cards such as Sound Blaster, Adlib and Roland MT-32

Something along those lines.

That's much better !
Only thing giving me a small headache is the bluish background gradient.
But I guess that's up to individual taste...

And I agree with Dosfreak and avatar_58. Lining out DOSBox's real features rather than the bugfixes would make more sense.
(Who needs bugfixes when there are features which are working fine 😉 )

maYO wrote:

That's much better ! Only thing giving me a small headache is the bluish background gradient. But I guess that's up to individua […]
Show full quote

That's much better !
Only thing giving me a small headache is the bluish background gradient.
But I guess that's up to individual taste...

And I agree with Dosfreak and avatar_58. Lining out DOSBox's real features rather than the bugfixes would make more sense.
(Who needs bugfixes when there are features which are working fine 😉 )

I only suggest it because everyone is so hellbent on what DOSbox can't do or has trouble with, rather than the great features and things it CAN do. I try to stick up for the damn thing at every chance on the other forums I visit, and for good reason. DOSBox to me IS the future of dos games, whether some people care to admit it or not.

Mabye the title of each game below the picture for those not familiar with those games? (Sadly I can name them all).

ok...and this one?

In it you show a picture of Wing Commander Prophacy. This is a relitivly new game and I think it would be way too high end for dosbox to be needed, as is Command and Conqure I think. Prophacy definatly works fine on a normal computor. I beleive you were thinking of the Original Wing Commander which is a popular dos game

here is a pic i found with google

Yeah, WC:Prophecy is a Windows game, but the original C&C should be playable under dosbox on a decent system.

yes sorry....i missed a bit with that image (that said wing commander...really it's prophecy?? sorry for that...i'll change it by your post one.... 😀

changed!

Yes i'll try C&C on my machine and runs in DOSBox of course....

DosFreak dedicated logo 😈 (2 minutes work)

Another one

I notice the EGA version of Gauntlet in there. I haven't got the game, so I can't test it, but I seem to recall reading that the EGA version crashes after selecting a character and that only the CGA version is playable. Has this changed?

I find the lightning a bit odd, especially the transition from the brigth Dos spot to the F. There's an ugly transition there, one can see single pixels oO. I like the Font though =)