My Pentium 200 mmx DOSBox results: 0.0 (115626.7s) / 0.8 (1275.9s)
I expected 320x200 also running for hours, but it was surprisingly fast in comparison. Maybe DOSBox's VESA BIOS really is too slow for the emulated CPU speed.

I have a P60 laptop in the closet.....

Marek wrote:

My Pentium 200 mmx DOSBox results: 0.0 (115626.7s) / 0.8 (1275.9s)
I expected 320x200 also running for hours, but it was surprisingly fast in comparison. Maybe DOSBox's VESA BIOS really is too slow for the emulated CPU speed.

P3 looks have larger speed difference between VGA and SVGA modes than P4 and later. P, P2 may have it more than P3. But the difference in 90 times for 7.5 times more pixels is... I have no words. The code is optimized for P3 at least, but other hardware besides CPU may affect this too, some "bottle neck".

Thanks for P200 data.
Its Speed Test results would be interesting to see later too.

My other Phenom 320x200 results:
XP 64: 75.3, 76.1, 71.0
XP 32: 75.4, 76.5, 71.3

Marek wrote:

My other Phenom 320x200 results

Thanks. I'll take results of WinXP-32 as fastest.

Athlon XP 2600+ is still interesting too. We have no any of this series.

DosFreak wrote:

I have a P60 laptop in the closet

Pentium Mobile 60 MHz absents in lists on pedia and intel.com

Sorry P166

My brain is going.

DosFreak wrote:

Sorry P166

Mobile P166 MMX.
You are welcome to do 2 days testing Quake's run in any time.
Based on Quake results desktop P200 MMX emulates ~386 20 MHz. Your notebook can give emulation speed of 386 16 MHz and hence to run most games of 1980s. You may check it quickly by Speed Test.

My Athlon XP 2600+ results:
Windows 2000 320x200: 39.1, 39.8, 36.8
Linux Mint 17.2 native DOSBox: 27.2, 27.4, 25.3
Linux Mint 17.2 DOSBox in Wine: 15.6, 15.7, 13.6
With Wine, the framerate seems much more variable than all other tests for some reason.

Booted a DOS 7.1 CD and started Quake from a FAT32 harddisk partition:
18.0, 18.6, 18.0 / 229.3, 228.5, 226.8
It's an nVidia 6600 PCI model. The VESA BIOS seems ridiculously slow here. Not much faster than in DOSBox. 😳

Marek wrote:

My Athlon XP 2600+

Thank you.
Wich Athlon XP 2600+? CPU-Z may be used to check.

18.0, 18.6, 18.0 / 229.3, 228.5, 226.8

SVGA results are too incorrect. if mtrrlfbe was used, then video card is bad for this

Tertz wrote:

Wich Athlon XP 2600+? CPU-Z may be used to check.

Barton Multiplier 11.5.

MSI GT72 1666 laptop

Intel Core i7 5700HQ 3.5GHz (Win10-64): 46.4,51.6,45.3 / 148.5,152.2,141.4

Marek
Is Linux Mint at XP2600 - 32 bit?

DosFreak
Thanks for new CPU.

Tertz wrote:

Marek
Is Linux Mint at XP2600 - 32 bit?

Yes. It is a 32 bit cpu after all. 😉

Marek
Thanks for details.

demo1 @ 800x600 = 35 fps

Core i7 2760QM @ 3.2 GHz (win7-64)

havli wrote:

demo1 @ 800x600 = 35 fps Core i7 2760QM @ 3.2 GHz (win7-64)

Data for 320x200 is obligate too according to current measure procedure, as viewsize 120.
Xeon E5-1650 is more interesting as exotic.

DOSBox SVN r3938
ASUS X200LA laptop
Core i3-4010u 1.7GHz 4GB RAM, Intel HD 4400
Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS/Kernel 3.19.0-30 x86_64

cmdline: quake -nocdaudio +vid_mode 13 +viewsize 100 +timedemo {demo}
Demo1: 24.4, 24.5, 24.5
Demo2: 27.4, 27.1, 27.5
Demo3: 24.2, 24.2, 24.3

You can also run GLQuake within DOSBox/Win98 with 3Dfx Voodoo emulation to get better graphics and performance.

kjliew

To compare results with other systems it needs to make the measurement in same conditions described in the 1st theme's message.

Tertz wrote:

havli wrote:

demo1 @ 800x600 = 35 fps Core i7 2760QM @ 3.2 GHz (win7-64)

Data for 320x200 is obligate too according to current measure procedure, as viewsize 120.
Xeon E5-1650 is more interesting as exotic.

320x200 + viewsize 120 = 105.4 fps

I don't have the xeon at hand currently, I will post results later. It is not that exotic anyway, I expect fps to be very similar to this:
Intel Core i7 3930K 4.2 GHz (Win7-64): 47, 55, 49 / 159, 162, 150

havli wrote:

320x200 + viewsize 120 = 105.4 fps

Thanks. Was viewsize 120 used for 800x600? If not, then I may interpolate fps or you may remeasure.
Single core mode turbo for i7-2760QM is 3.5 GHz. Is the CPU downclocked, for example because of energy economy mode? Or by unkown reason CPU-Z just showed this under the load in DOSBox? I may interpolate results to 3.5 GHz also, but it's better get them at full CPU performance.

I don't have the xeon at hand currently, I will post results later. It is not that exotic anyway, I expect fps to be very similar to this: Intel Core i7 3930K 4.2 GHz

Ok, time waits. Xeon should be close, but is interesting anyway.
I hope you'll find the possibility and interest to measure speed on some of your retro CPUs in Speed Test with DOSBox, in case systems with them are gatherd and in working condition. Games befor 1995 used FPU not much, so results in Speed Test inside DOSBox are closer to performance in them, while emulation of games like Quake is too hard for anything befor P4.