VOGONS


First post, by mirekluza

User metadata
Rank DOSBox Moderator
Rank
DOSBox Moderator

There are some reports about modem not working in 0.62, 0.63. The recent one was on IRC from 20. November 2004:

[21:30] <Jammet> Hiya ...
[21:31] <Jammet> The modem emulation (telnet) does not work anymore. Since DosBox version 0.61 actually. Did nobody notice that?
[21:31] <Jammet> I'd love it if this could be repaired, because I really enjoy using telnet BBS's... and I'd prefer using my old DOS terminal.

I reported previous complaints in Modem support is broken in 0.62 to CANADACOW (on betaboard), he said that modem works ok (I do not use it myself, so I did not test it).

Could anybody else confirm/disprove that there is some broken functionality connected with modem? I mean something which worked in older version, e.g. in 0.61 but does not work in 0.63.
In this thread I am not interested in hearing what never worked. I want to find out whether there is really something broken ...

BTW: I hope that all people here know that modem must be allowed in DOSBOX.CONF (it is switched off by default in 0.62, 0.63).

Mirek

Reply 1 of 3, by canadacow

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

After enabling it in the config file and making sure the lines read:

modem=true
comport=2
listenport=23

The current version works just fine.

Reply 2 of 3, by jusid

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I confirm that modem is not working in 0.62 and 0.63.
I have modem enabled in dosbox.conf
I run BananaCom to test modem. The program can not detect modem. There are following lines in DOSBox debug window:

Modem Sent Command:

Modem Sent Command:

When using DOSBox 0.61 modem works fine.

Reply 3 of 3, by MiniMax

User metadata
Rank Moderator
Rank
Moderator
mirekluza wrote:

Could anybody else confirm/disprove that there is some broken functionality connected with modem? I mean something which worked in older version, e.g. in 0.61 but does not work in 0.63.
In this thread I am not interested in hearing what never worked. I want to find out whether there is really something broken ...

As a followup to this bug report for 0.63, I re-ran the same program+dialer entry with DOSBox 0.61.

With 0.61 it worked much better 😀 The main program running in the DOSBox window, simply said:

Dialing NewEntry
ATDT192.168.1.102.80
NO CARRIER

In the DOSBox console, I saw some expected(?) debug messages, e.g.

MIDI:Opened device:win32
Read from B 0
Read from B 0
Read from E 0
Read from E 0
Read from E 0
Read from E 0
Read from E 0
TX add
Modem Sent Command:

TX add A
RX add A
TX add T
RX add T
TX add D
RX add D
TX add T
RX add T
TX add 1
TX add 9
TX add 2
TX add .
RX add 1
RX add 9
RX add 2
RX add .
TX add 1
TX add 6
TX add 8
TX add .
TX add 1
TX add .
TX add 1
TX add 0
TX add 2
TX add .
TX add 8
TX add 0
RX add 1
RX add 6
RX add 8
RX add .
RX add 1
RX add .
RX add 1
RX add 0
RX add 2
RX add .
RX add 8
RX add 0
TX add
Modem Sent Command: ATDT192.168.1.102.80

host 192.168.1.102.80 port 17
Failed to resolve host 192.168.1.102.80:accept() failed
RX add
RX add

RX add N
Show last 12 lines
RX add O
RX add
RX add C
RX add A
RX add R
RX add R
RX add I
RX add E
RX add R
RX add
RX add

With 0.63, BananaCom initially reports: "Wiring problem! Modem cable? Power?" upon startup. At that point the console window only show the usual "CONFIG:Loading settings from config file modem.conf" and "MIDI:Opened device:win32".

Dialing the new entry with 0.63 gives me a "Dialing NewEntry" in the DOSBox window, and a single "Modem Sent Command:" in the console window. Then there is the long wait, and any minute now I should get the failed assertions..... Waits..... waits....Its a long wait 4 min. 20 secs so far.. Ah - there!!! some 6-7 minutes later

DOSBox 60 seconds guide | How to ask questions
_________________
Lenovo M58p | Core 2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66 GHz | Radeon R7 240 | LG HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GH40N | Fedora 32