DOSBox SVN Builds

Developer's Forum, for discussion of bugs, code, and other developmental aspects of DOSBox.

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby Serious Callers Only » 2012-9-30 @ 21:32

I think i might be a moron
{svn-revno}, {svn-revno:<branch id>}
Replaced with the svn revision number of the revision that was built
0.4


had (version of the recipe protocol) 0.3
Serious Callers Only
Member
 
Posts: 349
Joined: 2003-4-26 @ 21:34

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby HunterZ » 2012-9-30 @ 21:37

r3708 is an old SVN revision number. The changelog shows the latest to be r3798:
2012-09-25 20:17 qbix79

* [r3798] src/dos/dos_files.cpp: Fix oversight in r3666. (danoon)
User avatar
HunterZ
l33t++
 
Posts: 6057
Joined: 2003-1-31 @ 19:04
Location: Seattle

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby Serious Callers Only » 2012-9-30 @ 21:51

Yes, but that will hopefully be fixed next time it builds (sometime tomorrow). I was first using the wrong option "{revno}" that is the revision of the bazaar mirror imports, and then i tried the correct one {svn-revno}, but i was using the previous version of the recipe protocol and that option was only on the next.

The current dosbox on the PPA IS the trunk of the svn, just wrongly labelled... as for the version for the wiki, you could say 'number after 'r' in the name is the svn revision' since that will change (and it will be correct tomorrow, when launchpad builds again with {svn-revno}).

edit: better put in 'after the r' because i'm going to go with:
{debversion}+r{svn-revno} which is more recognizable as a revision number.

edit: HA! They didn't show 0.4 because it crashes because didn't enable the right version of python for their buildbots yet.

edit2: i put it back to dates. When canonical updates launchpad (when they release quantal apparently) i will switch the name for the svn revision.
Serious Callers Only
Member
 
Posts: 349
Joined: 2003-4-26 @ 21:34

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby Qbix » 2012-10-01 @ 07:15

http://svn.code.sf.net/p/dosbox/code-0/dosbox/trunk/ is the right one. I accidentally committed the last revision 3798 to both trees.
Water flows down the stream
How to ask questions the smart way!
User avatar
Qbix
DOSBox Author
 
Posts: 10451
Joined: 2002-11-27 @ 14:50
Location: Fryslan

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby Serious Callers Only » 2012-10-01 @ 17:19

Ok then, i made another mirror.
Serious Callers Only
Member
 
Posts: 349
Joined: 2003-4-26 @ 21:34

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby HunterZ » 2012-10-01 @ 19:15

Let me know when you get it to produce a new good build and I'll update the wiki.

I might split out the discussion into a separate thread as well, provided nobody has any objections.
User avatar
HunterZ
l33t++
 
Posts: 6057
Joined: 2003-1-31 @ 19:04
Location: Seattle

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby Serious Callers Only » 2012-10-07 @ 02:22

It's good now /using a name based on the date of the last modification to one of the 'pieces' used, either the dosbox svn, or the munt git, or (in this recent case) the altered mt32 integration patch repository.

Caveats: changelog is not updated (it's stolen from the debian package, dosbox uses manual changelogs), doesn't build on lucid and earlier due to a launchpad bug.

As i said, i will change the name of the package to include the dosbox svn revision when launchpad updates.
Serious Callers Only
Member
 
Posts: 349
Joined: 2003-4-26 @ 21:34

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby Qbix » 2012-10-07 @ 09:26

http://source.dosbox.com/dosboxsvn.txt is a changelog, generated with svn2cl, so maybe use that ?

I use this command to generate it
Code: Select all
svn2cl -i -r HEAD:3609 --stdout
Water flows down the stream
How to ask questions the smart way!
User avatar
Qbix
DOSBox Author
 
Posts: 10451
Joined: 2002-11-27 @ 14:50
Location: Fryslan

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby Dominus » 2012-10-07 @ 11:00

qbix: that's handy. thanks
User avatar
Dominus
DOSBox Moderator
 
Posts: 7382
Joined: 2002-10-03 @ 09:54
Location: Vienna

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby Serious Callers Only » 2012-10-07 @ 18:01

Qbix wrote:http://source.dosbox.com/dosboxsvn.txt is a changelog, generated with svn2cl, so maybe use that ?

I use this command to generate it
Code: Select all
svn2cl -i -r HEAD:3609 --stdout


Nice, although i don't think it will work automatically unless the file is in a repository somewhere. Launchpad builds in two stages; one uses bazaar to download and combine the branches and check the debian source package generated (including the changelog i think),
the other actually builds with no internet access. It's the reason why i can't build my java ivy project on launchpad.
Even if it was, i think svn2cl is not on the main universe ubuntu repo so it can't be installed on the buildbots.
Serious Callers Only
Member
 
Posts: 349
Joined: 2003-4-26 @ 21:34

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby Qbix » 2012-10-07 @ 20:35

it's part of subversion-tools
Water flows down the stream
How to ask questions the smart way!
User avatar
Qbix
DOSBox Author
 
Posts: 10451
Joined: 2002-11-27 @ 14:50
Location: Fryslan

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby Serious Callers Only » 2012-10-07 @ 21:21

Humm so it is... it might be possible.

edit: looks like it isn't... launchpad refuses (wisely maybe) to run commands not whitelisted on their recipes (they do have a 'run' for bash forks but it's disabled).
Serious Callers Only
Member
 
Posts: 349
Joined: 2003-4-26 @ 21:34

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby HunterZ » 2012-11-03 @ 02:45

Serious Callers Only's PPA build seems to be blowing up: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/12177154 ... ILD.txt.gz
User avatar
HunterZ
l33t++
 
Posts: 6057
Joined: 2003-1-31 @ 19:04
Location: Seattle

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby Serious Callers Only » 2012-11-08 @ 15:06

Not anymore. I was experimenting with whole program optimization, now i got it to build in raring, and it should go on in the others in 5 hours or so.

https://launchpadlibrarian.net/12226472 ... ING.txt.gz

Also, fixed a problem with the launchpad git update mirroring (github apparently doesn't like being mirrored using the git https protocol, had to change it to git urls).
Serious Callers Only
Member
 
Posts: 349
Joined: 2003-4-26 @ 21:34

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby robertmo » 2012-12-23 @ 10:52

ykhwong
since Dec. 4. 2012 there are "save/load complete" messages missing from status window in your build
User avatar
robertmo
l33t
 
Posts: 4160
Joined: 2003-6-18 @ 10:35

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby robertmo » 2013-1-08 @ 22:01

Jan. 7. 2013
both messages are the same right now (loaded)
User avatar
robertmo
l33t
 
Posts: 4160
Joined: 2003-6-18 @ 10:35

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby ykhwong » 2013-1-09 @ 02:05

robertmo wrote:Jan. 7. 2013
both messages are the same right now (loaded)


I will fix that later. Thanks for the info.
ykhwong
Oldbie
 
Posts: 627
Joined: 2004-3-17 @ 15:35

<removed by author>

Postby RusselFuture » 2013-2-26 @ 23:22

<post removed by author>
Last edited by RusselFuture on 2013-3-01 @ 22:33, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
RusselFuture
Newbie
 
Posts: 1
Joined: 2013-2-26 @ 21:43

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby Dominus » 2013-2-26 @ 23:25

while it is a valid question, please have the courtesy to not post OT stuff in a topic.
Also I'd base all porting on current SVN instead of the ages old 0.74 release :)
User avatar
Dominus
DOSBox Moderator
 
Posts: 7382
Joined: 2002-10-03 @ 09:54
Location: Vienna

Re: DOSBox SVN Builds

Postby robertmo » 2013-7-03 @ 21:02

I noticed that ykhwong's build slows down and eventually totally freezes after some pause/unpause (alt-pause)
User avatar
robertmo
l33t
 
Posts: 4160
Joined: 2003-6-18 @ 10:35

PreviousNext

Return to DOSBox Development

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests