Has anyone run Blood under DOSBox fast? Is DOSBox powerful enough to run a game like Blood?
Depends on what you consider fast.
Athlon XP 2800+
Runs at 20+ fps in 320X200, dynamic core, frameskip=0, no sound.
Considering that on the host you can get around 200+ fps in 1600x1200, then yeah I wouldn't consider DosBox fast. 😉
You could up the frameskip a bit and perhaps get a bit higher resolution but your better off running under Windows XP, or using IceCold's WinBlood port (Still beta).
When I ran it under DOSBox, Blood was so so slow. It started playing the demo of Blood (a recorded demo). I can hear it, but couldn't see it. Am wondering whether I need to tweak DOSBox, such as whether you can specify the CPU to emulate, etc.
Make sure your dosbox.conf has core=dynamic and make sure Blood is set to 320x200 in blood.cfg.
I see I see. Anything else, like tweaking the cycles or that framerate thingy?
I suggest you search the forums and the dosbox wiki for information on how to tune speed. There's lots of advice around, look for it!
wrote:Depends on what you consider fast. […]
Depends on what you consider fast.
Athlon XP 2800+
Runs at 20+ fps in 320X200, dynamic core, frameskip=0, no sound.Considering that on the host you can get around 200+ fps in 1600x1200, then yeah I wouldn't consider DosBox fast. 😉
You could up the frameskip a bit and perhaps get a bit higher resolution but your better off running under Windows XP, or using IceCold's WinBlood port (Still beta).
How do you run it in the host? I tried but it didn't work at all.
He probably means running it under native ms-dos. 😎
Intel i7 5960X
Gigabye GA-X99-Gaming 5
8 GB DDR4 (2100)
8 GB GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming (Gigabyte)
Do you have a link to IceBlood's WinBlood port? I did a quick google on it but didn't see it.
I tried looking for it last week but the forum/site disappeared. Odd because it looked like work was progressing on it...they probably just moved but now even a simple google search can't find any valid links.
