GL1zdA wrote:6. Does anyone know, where I can find a manual for this board?
elhvb.com has set up a mirror of the currently defunct MOBOKIVE Archive: A manual for your board can be found here: Classic-PCI-ED_4317.pdf
GL1zdA wrote:1. Are the LPT and COM headers standardized? Will cables from other motherboards fit them?
Nope, as far as I know there is no standard for COM/LPT headers, but most of them use the same layout anyway, at least those headers present on mainboards. On the other hand I've encountered cables taken from ancient ISA I/O cards, which had a different pinout.
The manual mentioned above has a pinout for the headers, so it shouldn't be difficult to find a matching cable.
GL1zdA wrote:2. For what cache modules should I look (I mean what timings should they have?). Also what should I put in the 'TAG' and 'U1' sockets in this motherboard?
3. How much cache should I use? The manual on stason.org states the motherboard can either use 128 kB or 256 kB. But I cant find any information about how much memory will be cached. Here I found information about the Saturn Chipsets - both cache 128 MB RAM with 512 kB cache, but it seems that my mainboard is using the Aries (420EX) chipset.
According to the TULARC page and the MOBOKIVE manual the maximum cache possible on this board is 256 kB, consisting of eight 32Kx8 chips, with another one added as TAG RAM. These chips should be easy to find, as they were used on most 486 boards. I don't think this board will be able to cache more than 64 MB of main memory.
The 'U1' socket is rather strange, I reckon this is for the dirty bit needed for L2 cache write-back mode. If my theory is correct, you may leave this socket empty, but then you could only use the L2 cache in write-through mode, which costs a bit of performance. TULARC lists a 16Kx1 chip for this socket, good luck finding one of those!
Since the board only supports bus speeds up to 33 MHz, chips with 20ns timings will suffice, but to be on the safe side I'd suggest getting 15ns chips.
GL1zdA wrote:5. Might it work with an AMD 5x86?
Theoretically it might be possible, but don't count on it, this board was made by Intel...
GL1zdA wrote:7. Should I use a fan/heatsink for the IntelDX4 or AMD5x86?
A heatsink is definitely required. You can omit the fan in case the heatsink is big enough, although typical 486 heatsinks are too inefficient to cool a DX4 or 5x86 without a fan.