VOGONS

Search

Common searches

G80 supports full MPEG2 bitstream decoding!

Topic actions

First post, by Standard Def Steve

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Just noticed this today as I was playing a 34 Mb/s 1080p MPEG-2 encoded MKV file ripped from a Blu-ray disc. MPC-HC indicated that DXVA was being used, and sure enough, CPU usage was at around 8%. I was using a dual core S939 Opteron overclocked to 3.0GHz. The video card tested was a 640MB 8800GTS running 341.44 on Win7 x64.
I always thought that the old G80 was incapable of full bitstream decoding even with MPEG-2, so this was kind of a pleasant surprise!
A 32 Mb/s h.264 stream ripped from a another BD was a different story. With this format, MPC-HC did not use DXVA and CPU usage was around 35-62%.

Interestingly, ATI cards of that era don't appear to support full bitstream decoding. Playing the same 34 Mb/s MPEG-2 stream with a Radeon X1950 XTX resulted in significantly higher CPU usage: around 15-30%. MPC-HC did not enable DXVA with the X1950 XTX.

I wonder if GeForce 7 can perform full MPEG-2 bitstream decoding as well? Apparently they use the same video engine as the G80-based cards. I'm gonna have to dig up my old 7950GT and find out!

94 MHz NEC VR4300 | SGI Reality CoPro | 8MB RDRAM | Each game gets its own SSD - nooice!

Reply 1 of 5, by Standard Def Steve

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Hmm, GeForce 7 does not seem to perform MPEG-2 bitstream decoding. With the GeForce 7950GT, CPU utilization was slightly lower than what I saw with the X1950 XTX: around 12-28%. Still, a far cry from the 6-8% I saw with the G80 8800GTS. So it appears that G80's video processor is more advanced than G70's. Unless MPC-HC is just being wonky and doesn't allow DXVA on anything below GF8.

Anyway, I know it's largely useless info, but I thought it was kinda interesting. 🙄

94 MHz NEC VR4300 | SGI Reality CoPro | 8MB RDRAM | Each game gets its own SSD - nooice!

Reply 4 of 5, by elianda

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I think wikipedia has a quite comprehensive list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_PureVideo
Also check this table: https://www.nvidia.com/docs/CP/11036/PureVide … _Comparison.pdf

Be aware that there are different capabilities even within the same generation. Also what you test are the features that are exposed through DXVA only.

Retronn.de - Vintage Hardware Gallery, Drivers, Guides, Videos. Now with file search
Youtube Channel
FTP Server - Driver Archive and more
DVI2PCIe alignment and 2D image quality measurement tool

Reply 5 of 5, by mirh

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
havli wrote:

G80 is 6 months older than R600, comparing it to R580 is perfectly valid.

Except that was launched like 9 months earlier.
And honestly, it seemed obvious to compare with R600, considering technologically they are the first unified shaders architectures.

elianda wrote:

I think wikipedia has a quite comprehensive list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_PureVideo
Also check this table: https://www.nvidia.com/docs/CP/11036/PureVide … _Comparison.pdf

Cool! And it seems there was even something down to GeForce4.
Albeit it predates ATi earlier efforts I know, Wikipedia mentions some kind of.. already existing competing solution though.

It would be nice to have a similar in depth comparison for UVD anyway.

pcgamingwiki.com

Go to top of page Go to top of page
Back to General Old Hardware
Close window
Close window