All this talk of artifacting graphics cards just makes me flash back to my poor Radeon 9800 Pro 128 MB. It was sitting in storage for the longest time, but I was about to flash it for Power Mac G4 use when the news struck me: ARTIFACTS. ARTIFACTS EVERYWHERE ON THE BIOS SCREEN.
Augh, another 9800 bites the dust. Should've kept my 9600 XT, as maybe that would've still worked for Core Image support without having to go out and buy another card.
The main incentive was that I got a Power Mac G4 MDD FW800 about a week ago. It came with a Radeon 7000, much weaker than the usual stock Radeon 9000, and it shows slight artifacting. Not enough to be unusable, but enough to be annoying regardless. That 9800 Pro, on the other hand? Even if it does POST, it's nigh unreadable, making any flashing efforts pointless.
I guess I'm out shopping for an AGP card I can flash that supports Core Image, and then pair that up with a Radeon 9200/9250 PCI for accelerated OS 9 (no Core Image-compatible card has OS 9 drivers). I'm thinking 6600 GT or 7800 GS for the OS X side of things, just to save me potential extension hell with an ATI card when booted into OS 9. (And before anyone points out the supposed inability for FW800 MDDs to boot OS 9: Mac OS 9 Lives. That is all.)
I would normally opt for a Voodoo5 5500 Mac PCI for OS 9, but let's just say you don't wanna see the eBay price history on those things. They make the AGP V5s look cheap!
At the very least, not only does it more or less work and came loaded with hard drives (two 80 GB and a 200 GB all functional, and a dead 120 GB drive, with the two 80 GB drives already packing Tiger and Leopard Server), but there was a SCSI controller and a Sonnet Tempo Trio card to boot. I moved the latter to my Power Mac 6500 just for the sake of giving that thing USB and FireWire on one PCI card, since when you've only got two slots, every card counts.
kanecvr wrote:TheAbandonwareGuy wrote:kanecvr wrote:
Yup. Love my MSI 5950 Ultra as well. I'm not using it tough since it tends to get pretty hot and these cards have a tendency to die due to thermal stress. I have a couple of Quadro FX 3000 cards (FX 5900 Ultra) and I use those.
Fair enough. I paid 25 for mine shipped with said cooling modifications done before hand on Amibay. I guess I got Lucky. I'd imagine you could probably get those 5900 based Quadros up to 5950U clocks anyways.
For me, buying something like this and not using it would be like buying a stock car to drive on Sundays. A complete waste. Unless something is exceedingly rare (for example the FX5800 Ultras) in which case I'm more likely to save it for special occasions.
5950 Ultra cards are pretty damn rare. There's none on ebay right now, and I've only seen two cards myself - the MSI I own and an ASUS back in the day - that's it.
Huh, I must be one lucky guy, for I found a 5950U in the same parts bin that turned up a 6800 Ultra AGP and Voodoo5 5500 AGP before for dirt cheap.
I recall it working, but then I found that one of the boxy caps on the back came loose from one of the solder pads... gonna have to replace that component, and replace my crappy soldering iron while I'm at it because it's not cutting it.
To be honest, I probably would've just left it there if not for this very forum pointing out the FX cards' DX8 and prior compatibility. I didn't have a very strong opinion on GeForce FX in general due to their infamously terrible DX9/SM 2.0 performance relative to the Radeon 9x00 lineup.