Yea the 9800 and GTS 250 got more realistic cooling than most 8800gt cards. So did the 8800gts using g92.

Also note that G92 came in both 65 and 55nm versions. That is 9800 and GTS 250, I believe. 55nm would bring lower temps as well.

gf8+..... *yawn* 😀

I know somebody that managed to get an Oak Warp 5. 😁

swaaye wrote:

I know somebody that managed to get an Oak Warp 5. 😁

Wooooow.....whats a Warp 5? 😕

(sorry 🤣 😜)

Oak Technology's unreleased 2D/3D graphics chip:

http://fireeye.tripod.com/warp5.html

Haha,

Test system 6x86 Pr200 32 megabytes 60ns EDO (2x16) AOpen AX5T-3.1 Oak Warp 5 209a , 4megs STB Velocity 128 , 4megs S3 Trio 64V2 […]
Show full quote

Test system
6x86 Pr200
32 megabytes 60ns EDO (2x16)
AOpen AX5T-3.1
Oak Warp 5 209a , 4megs
STB Velocity 128 , 4megs
S3 Trio 64V2 , 1 meg
2.1 gig Samsung EIDE
2D tests were run on 800x600x16 because S3 had only 1 meg RAM.

Pippy P. Poopypants wrote:

Oak Technology's unreleased 2D/3D graphics chip:

http://fireeye.tripod.com/warp5.html

Interesting...so anyone here have one? Along with a pic? 😁

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=53 … hlight=oak+warp