Pentium 4 2.8/512/533 @3.1ghz
Soyo P4S 645DX Dragon Ultra
1gbx3 DDR266 CL2
XP Pro sp3
08m 25.577s

Pentium D 965 EE @ 4.8 (air cooled)

At this speed this CPU suffers from thermal throttling when running anything that causes heavy CPU load.

Pentium 3 800MHz, Asus CUSL2-C (Socket 370, Intel 815EP), 256mb PC133 ram, Voodoo 3 3000 16mb AGP, Windows 98SE

Escom Pentium 100mhz, 8 Mb RAM, Trident TGUI9440 1Mb VGA, 2.1 gb HD, Win95 OSR2: Time for 1 million, 30m43.100s

Compaq Presario 2232, Cyrix MediaGX 133mhz, 30mb RAM, 540mb HD, Win95 OSR2: Time for 1 million, 24m06.965s

Here is a socket 771 quad core Xeon X5460 running in a nForce 780i socket 775 board.

The "old" 2007 tech can still get good benchmark scores 😀

Here is another nice score with a socket 775 system.

I am testing the Asus Commandos (P965) limits to see if its a good candidate for a Xeon mod. So far the board seems great even if it wont clock memory as good as some of my other boards. A 12s SuperPi 1M score with a Q6600 is perhaps not that uncommon, but its an air cooled Q6600 with the older B3 core revision. 100% stability at more reasonable voltage ends at 3600 MHz with this CPU on this board with this cooling.

Q6600 running at 9*433~3900 MHz, 2GB DDR2 1066 memory running at ~stock speed and timings.

AMD Sempron 2800+(thououghbred B), ViA KM400 board, 1 GB DDR 266, win xp sp3, SiS 315E graphics.

E8400 @ 4700 Mhz, below 10s 😀 Cooling ThermalRight 120 Ultra with some old Papst fan @~1500 rpm.

The E8600 got a little bit better time than the E8400. If I did not use such an old version of Super PI it would be easier to see the difference 😜

My new summer system crushes the poor E8600.

Pentium 3 Katmai 600MHz, Asus P3B-F (Slot 1, Intel 440BX), 512mb PC133 ram, NVIDIA GeForce 2 GTS 32mb AGP, Windows 98SE

A i7 3770 non K can be convinced its a fast CPU, at least when not all cores are loaded 😁

1M.

32M. As a reference the 2600K got 7 min 33s at 4500 MHz but with 2133 MHz memory.

An Athlon 64 might be slow when it comes to Super Pi if you compare it to modern Intel CPUs but its not that much slower than modern AMD CPUs 😜

And Now for Something Completely Different

A reference before I start upgrading and tweaking this system more. Not that I think it will get much faster in SuperPi but I do not have that many benchmarks for NT 4. I could not transfer the image as the USB on my Intel PR440FX bugs out if I try to write files larger than 1MB, reading large files from the USB stick works fine. Im to lazy to fix JPG support right now but I will...later...

Skyscraper wrote:

The E8600 got a little bit better time than the E8400. If I did not use such an old version of Super PI it would be easier to se […]
Show full quote

The E8600 got a little bit better time than the E8400. If I did not use such an old version of Super PI it would be easier to see the difference 😜

What sourcery is this? Damn i didn't know that the core2 series could thorw such a punch in SuperPI, even if overclocked!

My i5 750 does 1M in 11 seconds at 3.8Ghz.

rick6 wrote:

Skyscraper wrote:

The E8600 got a little bit better time than the E8400. If I did not use such an old version of Super PI it would be easier to see the difference 😜

What sourcery is this? Damn i didn't know that the core2 series could thorw such a punch in SuperPI, even if overclocked!

My i5 750 does 1M in 11 seconds at 3.8Ghz.

If you push the i5 750 to 4.2GHz you should see sub 10s scores 😀. Lynnfield IS much faster clock for clock than Wolfsdale but the overclocked E8600 holds its own thanks to the high clock speed. This Wolfdale system isnt 100% stable at that speed using air cooling though even if its running stable enough to run benchmarks.

I remember getting 10 seconds already at 4Ghz. I could never get it to boot properly at 4.2 Ghz, maybe my i5 is one of those less overclockable from the bunch (of the same model i mean).

Here is the same dual Pentium Pro system as above but now with 512KB cache CPUs, a little bit faster.

REF should be REG, its a typo.

The same Pentium Pro system yet again but with more memory (do not improve the performance in SuperPi) and 35 MHz extra core speed.

I see that I wrote 240MHz in the description as that is what the BIOS reports but the speed should be 245 MHz if the FSB actually is 70 MHz.

It seems dual CPU board is somewhat slower... or maybe windows NT.
My best score is 8m 4s with PPro 200/512 @ 233 MHz + win XP.
http://hwbot.org/submission/2409055_havli_sup … 8min_4sec_437ms