Benchmarking the AlphaPC 164 system
OS: Windows 2000 Pro RC2. I was unable to install WinNT4.0 as it gives me a weird INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE error during install in the same hardware configuration that W2k had no problem with.
Video card: Matrox G200 PCI. I have a PowerStorm 300 video card as well, but the NT drivers for this card when installed in W2k don't function correctly (no video after reboot) and there are no native W2k drivers since that OS was never officially released. Using the G200 as it's one of the few video cards that has drivers included in the RC2. I have a Permedia2 card as well,which would be another option to use if it weren't for the little detail that the card is dead. So I have to use the G200 as my only option. Other PCI cards that I tried do work but don't have drivers (Voodoo3, Voodoo Rush) so I would have no chance to have any acceleration at all. Others work partially (Matrox G450 gives corrupted colors and doesn't have drivers) or don't work at all (all Nvidia cards I tried).
But as it turns out, even though G200 has drivers, Quake2 can't use it accelerated; every time I try to set it to "native OpenGL" it automatically reverts to software mode.
So the best I could do is benchmark it in software mode.
The x86 binary of Quake2 (v.3.05) in software mode through the FX!32 binary translation software at 320x240 fullscreen is very, very slow. The timedemo of demo1.dm2 gave me 468.2seconds or 1.5FPS.
The Alpha native binary of Quake2 (v.3.17) in software mode at 320x240 fullscreen gives 31.3seconds or 22FPS, much better.
Same native binary at 640x480 software mode fullscreen gives 48.2s or 14.3FPS.
Still looking for a card that has native OpenGL support on Alpha Win2k RC2.
I/O, I/O,
It's off to disk I go,
With a bit and a byte
And a read and a write,
I/O, I/O