VOGONS


Reply 14840 of 19656, by aha2940

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
kolderman wrote on 2020-04-19, 20:50:
assasincz wrote on 2020-04-19, 20:41:

At first glance it performs almost the same as with Voodoo 2. Just the image looks cleaner and sharper. A bit of a disappointment

What were you expecting?

I've read several times that the performance of the V3 is about the same as two V2 in SLI, so maybe the expectation was for the V3 to be about twice as fast as a single V2? anyway, I'm happy with my V3 2000 PCI.

Reply 14841 of 19656, by kolderman

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
aha2940 wrote on 2020-04-19, 21:01:
kolderman wrote on 2020-04-19, 20:50:
assasincz wrote on 2020-04-19, 20:41:

At first glance it performs almost the same as with Voodoo 2. Just the image looks cleaner and sharper. A bit of a disappointment

What were you expecting?

I've read several times that the performance of the V3 is about the same as two V2 in SLI, so maybe the expectation was for the V3 to be about twice as fast as a single V2? anyway, I'm happy with my V3 2000 PCI.

To see the performance difference vs single V2 you need to up the resolution. Then it will be about twice as fast. Try 1024x768.

Reply 14842 of 19656, by leileilol

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

It's the Voodoo3 3000 that's often compared to the V2 SLI, but SLI setups are overrated impractical curiosities anyway and a V3 trounces that overall (larger resolution variance, no interleaves and far less thrashing) so.... 😀

apsosig.png

Reply 14843 of 19656, by appiah4

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

K6-2/400 is also bottlenecking that Voodoo 3 quite a bit, by the way.

Retronautics: A digital gallery of my retro computers, hardware and projects.

Reply 14844 of 19656, by leileilol

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I wouldn't say so. It could be a period machine, 3dfx machines weren't exactly aiming for the stars in 1999. There shouldn't be any obligation for anyone to be pressured to giving a Voodoo more CPU to "honor their glory" or some shit. It's not a Geforce2.

apsosig.png

Reply 14846 of 19656, by xjas

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Just a ramble: I re-organized some of my storage shelves to fit a couple extra machines I'm not using. Lately I've been thinking I should sell off all my pre-Pentium gear, once the pandemic dies down and people are comfortable meeting in person again. DOSBox & PCem adequately emulate anything 486 or below (DOSBox for running the software, PCem for emulating the hardware), and for me all the interesting stuff that's not well emulated - proprietary video APIs, sound cards with onboard synths, A3D/EAX - is for Socket 7 or later. I guess I could keep ONE nice late PCI 486 and a couple swappable CPUs for it, but I have no real need to have a locker full of difficult-to-maintain beige towers when anything I might run on them would do better on my 233MMX.

Not to mention it's so much easier to keep a Socket 7 or Slot 1 machine going in 2020 - they're more robust, spare parts are orders of magnitude more common, and there are far less BS incompatibilities or limitations that need to be worked around.

Anyone else in this boat? I guess this is exactly the same thought process we all went through in, like, 1996, but the difference now is I know exactly what from the early era I still want to have a way to run in the forseeable future.

twitch.tv/oldskooljay - playing the obscure, forgotten & weird - most Tuesdays & Thursdays @ 6:30 PM PDT. Bonus streams elsewhen!

Reply 14847 of 19656, by appiah4

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I am in the same boat but I opted to keep a 386SX and a 486 VLB instead. I maintain a Socket 7 as my main these days..

Retronautics: A digital gallery of my retro computers, hardware and projects.

Reply 14848 of 19656, by Horun

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I have 2 - XT's, 2-486's, 2 Pentiums, two P4's as complete machines plus a few newer (i5, i7) completes. Lots of boards, vid cards, etc but they do not take up the space of finished bunch of "beige towers" as you said. Yes I am in that boat ! with a handful of cases in the shed that will probably never get used in the near future have thought about getting rid of a bunch of them...

Hate posting a reply and have to edit it because it made no sense 😁 First computer was an IBM 3270 workstation with CGA monitor. 🤣 Second computer a 286 12Mhz with real IDE drive ! After that came 386, 486, Pentium, P.Pro and everything after....

Reply 14849 of 19656, by EvieSigma

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I've been trying to condense the stuff that's "redundant" (systems with very similar specs, for example) down to free up much needed space. It's hard though because a lot of these are perfectly fine machines and thus not deserving of being recycled yet selling them or even giving them away can be tough.

Reply 14850 of 19656, by Horun

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Today fixed a EFA P5V580AT rev A motherboard with an intermittent floppy drive issue, was cold solder joints on a couple of the floppy connector pins. Need to create a jumper doc and include pictures (for upload to our library) as jumpers are laid out different then the rev C at Stasons. Also added 1Mb to a Cirrus Logic based VLB card (FIC EUN542VT 5428 based), has soldered and sockets, added 8 x 44256-70's (per screen print on the board) to bring it to 2Mb. Still have to test it thoroughly but works ok so far.

Hate posting a reply and have to edit it because it made no sense 😁 First computer was an IBM 3270 workstation with CGA monitor. 🤣 Second computer a 286 12Mhz with real IDE drive ! After that came 386, 486, Pentium, P.Pro and everything after....

Reply 14851 of 19656, by bofh.fromhell

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Fujoshi-hime wrote on 2020-03-28, 22:52:
After, oh, I dunno, 23 years of writing on recordable discs for Windows OS's with a sharpie, I decided to level up my game today […]
Show full quote

After, oh, I dunno, 23 years of writing on recordable discs for Windows OS's with a sharpie, I decided to level up my game today after realizing that a stack of DVDRs I had were inkjet printable.

DOwb5HI.jpg

55bHm7k.jpg

mFEPdmS.jpg

Very nice!
What printer is that?

Reply 14852 of 19656, by Oj0

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
assasincz wrote on 2020-04-19, 20:41:

I picked up a package with Voodoo 3 2000 today; tested it, attached a 40mm fan to the heatsink and installed it in my K6-2/400 setup. At first glance it performs almost the same as with Voodoo 2. Just the image looks cleaner and sharper. A bit of a disappointment really, but now the V2 can go back to my Pentium build.

I then did some final cable management in my ongoing 286 build. I just need some beige 5.25" bay covers for the case (came with none) and I am done....for now....

As you have active cooling why not take it up to 3000/3500 speeds?

Bondye: Pentium II 400MHz, AOpen AX6BC EZ, 256MB PC-100, 40GB IDE HDD, PowerColor EvilKing 4 Voodoo4 4500 AGP
Daily Driver: Core i7-4790K, Gigabyte GA-Z97X Gaming5, 16GB DDR3-1600, 120GB SSD + 10.5TB SATA HDD, GeForce GTX 1050

Reply 14853 of 19656, by Almoststew1990

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Yesterday I achieved a new personal best of "cannot be arsed" and ended up throwing my go to retro PC bits into my modern case, with modern power supply and using my modern monitor, which means I needed a DVI graphics card.

hC7UVrfh.jpg

Annoyingly the AWE32 isn't being detected in any of the ISA slots. I've not changed any settings on either the board / bios or the jumpers on the card 🙁

Ryzen 3700X | 16GB 3600MHz RAM | AMD 6800XT | 2Tb NVME SSD | Windows 10
AMD DX2-80 | 16MB RAM | STB LIghtspeed 128 | AWE32 CT3910
I have a vacancy for a main Windows 98 PC

Reply 14854 of 19656, by F.H.OrbitalCrew

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

We are still struggling to complete version 1.0 of ReDos, beyond which we update our FastShell
fastshell.jpg

https://www.orbitalcrew.com/PROJECTS/redos.php
https://www.orbitalcrew.com/ARTNEWS/testboot_redos.php
https://www.orbitalcrew.com/ARTNEWS/fastshell.php

link

Reply 14855 of 19656, by derSammler

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
appiah4 wrote on 2020-04-19, 21:18:

K6-2/400 is also bottlenecking that Voodoo 3 quite a bit, by the way.

Exactly. Anything below a P3 1 GHz will make the V3 (and V2 SLI) starve, and that's why you don't see any difference. It can only go as fast as it gets geometry data from the CPU and the K6-2/400 simply can't provide these fast enough to push the card to its limit.

Reply 14856 of 19656, by Oj0

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
derSammler wrote on 2020-04-20, 11:29:
appiah4 wrote on 2020-04-19, 21:18:

K6-2/400 is also bottlenecking that Voodoo 3 quite a bit, by the way.

Exactly. Anything below a P3 1 GHz will make the V3 (and V2 SLI) starve, and that's why you don't see any difference. It can only go as fast as it gets geometry data from the CPU and the K6-2/400 simply can't provide these fast enough to push the card to its limit.

That seems a bit high? I was running my V2 SLI on a Celeron 300A @ 504 and there was a definite gain from single to dual card.

Bondye: Pentium II 400MHz, AOpen AX6BC EZ, 256MB PC-100, 40GB IDE HDD, PowerColor EvilKing 4 Voodoo4 4500 AGP
Daily Driver: Core i7-4790K, Gigabyte GA-Z97X Gaming5, 16GB DDR3-1600, 120GB SSD + 10.5TB SATA HDD, GeForce GTX 1050

Reply 14857 of 19656, by appiah4

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Oj0 wrote on 2020-04-20, 12:26:

That seems a bit high? I was running my V2 SLI on a Celeron 300A @ 504 and there was a definite gain from single to dual card.

At 800x600 it would run virtually at the same speed.

Retronautics: A digital gallery of my retro computers, hardware and projects.

Reply 14858 of 19656, by Oj0

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
appiah4 wrote on 2020-04-20, 12:51:
Oj0 wrote on 2020-04-20, 12:26:

That seems a bit high? I was running my V2 SLI on a Celeron 300A @ 504 and there was a definite gain from single to dual card.

At 800x600 it would run virtually at the same speed.

I only ran 800x600 or sometimes even 640x480. At the time I was actually using them they were connected to a 15" CRT which looked quite garbage at 1024x768.

We're going back a long, long time, so I can't give you exact numbers, but I remember there was definitely a performance difference.

Bondye: Pentium II 400MHz, AOpen AX6BC EZ, 256MB PC-100, 40GB IDE HDD, PowerColor EvilKing 4 Voodoo4 4500 AGP
Daily Driver: Core i7-4790K, Gigabyte GA-Z97X Gaming5, 16GB DDR3-1600, 120GB SSD + 10.5TB SATA HDD, GeForce GTX 1050

Reply 14859 of 19656, by derSammler

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Oj0 wrote on 2020-04-20, 12:26:

That seems a bit high? I was running my V2 SLI on a Celeron 300A @ 504 and there was a definite gain from single to dual card.

I wasn't saying that you need 1 GHz for a single Voodoo2. But if you look here:

https://www.voodooalert.de/board/forum/index. … sli-benchmarks/

A K6-2 500@500 does not gain anything from SLI (and he only has a 400 MHz one), apart from getting 1024x768 as a selectable resolution with z-buffering. Unreal Tournament even shows a slight decrease in performance with SLI, probably because the CPU has a hard time getting the additional work done needed to feed two V2 cards at once. There's just not enough horse power there.