I discovered Phils collection of benchmark utilitys today and originally just wanted to compare a couple of OEM p1 systems I have but as I was putting everything away I happened to loom over and notice my pile of PCI/ISA cards just sitting there so I figured...what the hell.
the system

Gateway 2000, Pentium 120, 64MB FPM RAM, no L2 cache

Matrox Mystique 2mb PCI
3DBENCH – 104.2FPS
PCPBENCH – 24.9 FPS
DOOM – 51.55 FPS
Quake – 22.9 FPS

ATI RageII+DVD 4mb PCI
3DBENCH – 95.6
PCPBENCH –23.2
DOOM –51.47
Quake – 21.5

Rendition Verite 2100 4mb PCI
3DBENCH – 30.5
PCPBENCH – 17.9
DOOM – 12.1
Quake – 16.9

ATI Mach32 1mb PCI
3DBENCH – 87.9
PCPBENCH – 23.8
DOOM – 47.60
Quake – 22.0

S3 Trio64v+ 2mb PCI
3DBENCH – 104.3
PCPBENCH – 24.6
DOOM – 50.71
Quake – 22.6

S3 Trio64v2/DX 2mb PCI
3DBENCH – 104.3
PCPBENCH – 24.9
DOOM – 50.50
Quake – 22.8

Trident Providia 9685 4mb PCI
3DBENCH – 85.1
PCPBENCH – 22.6
DOOM – 47.73
Quake – 21.0

Trident TVGA8900 1mb ISA
3DBENCH – 39.5
PCPBENCH – 17.2
DOOM – 18.69
Quake – 16.3

WD Paradise accelerator 24 768kb ISA
3DBENCH – 45.9
PCPBENCH – 18.7
DOOM – 22.54
Quake – 17.7

Tseng ET4000ax 1mb ISA
3DBENCH – 39.5
PCPBENCH – 17.2
DOOM – 18.68
Quake – 16.3

sorry I didnt make a fancy graph. I do have 2 questions after all this.

1) why is it that some cards crawl when the DOOM demo plays but Quake almost always seems at least playable? is it because Quake relies more on the CPU then the video card?

2)whats going on with the Tseng 4000? I knew it would be behind the PCI cards but I thought it would be at the top of the three ISA cards I tested but instead its suspiciously about equal with the Trident?