VOGONS


First post, by brostenen

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

How is the Ati Rage 128 line compared to the TNT2 line of GFX Cards? (Just that I can get a quick overview)

Wich line is faster than the other, and were in the line, do one "shine" over the other?
Just qurious on what cards outperforms the other, if all TNT2 versions and all Rage128 versions are compared.

Don't eat stuff off a 15 year old never cleaned cpu cooler.
Those cakes make you sick....

My blog: http://to9xct.blogspot.dk
My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/brostenen

001100 010010 011110 100001 101101 110011

Reply 2 of 8, by AlphaWing

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Here is an old AnandTech review with them comparing it against a TNT2\V3\G400 on a PIII 450\600.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/389
TNT2 ultra is the winner by a large margin in that review.

Reply 4 of 8, by noshutdown

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

rage128 is the same generation as tnt, so no match for tnt2.
the equivalent of tnt2 is rage128pro, however its clock couldn't scale well, so it could only match the standard tnt2 and no tnt2ultra.
performance of both the rage128 and rage128pro drop significantly in win2000/xp, probably due to poor drivers.

Reply 5 of 8, by leileilol

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

For Rage128, paletted texture comes as a 'last resort' option in the drivers actually. It's strongly discouraged to enable it.

Also, the reviews of the cards against each other need to take into account that the Rage128 drivers were infamously immature.

apsosig.png
long live PCem

Reply 6 of 8, by idspispopd

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Holering wrote:

Rage 128 has paletted texture and 32-bit color support. It's a real bottleneck with svga or higher modes on DOS games however (it gets choppy once you start playing build engine games at 640x480, and even Doom 95 at 640x480).

TNT2 also has 32-bit color support. The advantage of Rage 128 in this respect is that performance in 32-bit mode is not as much slower than in 16-bit mode as it is with other cards. Radeons also had this advantage compared to Geforces. IIRC this changed with the bandwitdth saving enhancements Geforce 3 ("Lightspeed Memory Architecture").

Reply 7 of 8, by Putas

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
noshutdown wrote:

rage128 is the same generation as tnt, so no match for tnt2.

Generation is up for a debate. Rage 128 was released in between those and first used 0.25m manufacturing.

leileilol wrote:

Also, the reviews of the cards against each other need to take into account that the Rage128 drivers were infamously immature.

That is why I expect some vogoner to rebench them soon 😎