VOGONS


Am386DX-40 with L2 256Kb 15ns cache

Topic actions

Reply 20 of 24, by tayyare

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
386SX wrote:
Stojke wrote:

OAK are known as Video Decelerators.

Ah ah but I have to admit I admire them to be my very first computer video card (probably the same one I found now, but this one has a dual bios and also a sort of serial port near the vga one.

It's not a serial port, it's a CGA/EGA/MDA (TTL) monitor port. I'm sure your card has some sort of switches, and by this switches, you can adjust your card as a CGA or EGA card. your card is probably this one (don't care about the brand, just check the layout):

50011-1.png

https://th99.bl4ckb0x.de/v/C-D/50011.htm

I still have the same card, and it was my first display card ever in my first PC from 1992.

GA-6VTXE PIII 1.4+512MB
Geforce4 Ti 4200 64MB
Diamond Monster 3D 12MB SLI
SB AWE64 PNP+32MB
120GB IDE Samsung/80GB IDE Seagate/146GB SCSI Compaq/73GB SCSI IBM
Adaptec AHA29160
3com 3C905B-TX
Gotek+CF Reader
MSDOS 6.22+Win 3.11/95 OSR2.1/98SE/ME/2000

Reply 21 of 24, by 386SX

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
tayyare wrote:
It's not a serial port, it's a CGA/EGA/MDA (TTL) monitor port. I'm sure your card has some sort of switches, and by this switche […]
Show full quote
386SX wrote:
Stojke wrote:

OAK are known as Video Decelerators.

Ah ah but I have to admit I admire them to be my very first computer video card (probably the same one I found now, but this one has a dual bios and also a sort of serial port near the vga one.

It's not a serial port, it's a CGA/EGA/MDA (TTL) monitor port. I'm sure your card has some sort of switches, and by this switches, you can adjust your card as a CGA or EGA card. your card is probably this one (don't care about the brand, just check the layout):

50011-1.png

https://th99.bl4ckb0x.de/v/C-D/50011.htm

I still have the same card, and it was my first display card ever in my first PC from 1992.

Thank, I didn't know that switch and yes it's there in the card. I remembered that the card was automatically switching at software request.

By the way I didn't think that ATi cards were not as fast as we later knew for the (PCI maybe not but) AGP cards. I see that there're many ISA cards even 8 bit built by ATi and I was actually tempted to buy one.

Reply 22 of 24, by Scali

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
386SX wrote:

By the way I didn't think that ATi cards were not as fast as we later knew for the (PCI maybe not but) AGP cards. I see that there're many ISA cards even 8 bit built by ATi and I was actually tempted to buy one.

ATi's first decent videocard was the Radeon 8500. Before that it was all pretty bad 😀
Even back in the CGA clone era, ATi's cards were actually slower than the original IBMs, which didn't exactly break any speed records 😀
I have a clone with an ATi Small Wonder card, and it was actually too slow to run a CGA demo written for the original IBM PC 5150: https://scalibq.wordpress.com/2014/11/22/cgad … y-codeblasters/

http://scalibq.wordpress.com/just-keeping-it- … ro-programming/

Reply 23 of 24, by 386SX

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Well if we have to measure when they became "faster" everywhere I would agree with the Radeon 8500 chipset but I cannot forget previous solutions like the Rage Fury Maxx (:D) and certainly the first original Radeon.

Reply 24 of 24, by idspispopd

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I agree with the WD90C31.
See also http://www.vgamuseum.info/index.php/benchmarks
WD90C30 and WD90C11 seem to be just as good, I suppose they are not as good for Windows (lacking acceleration).
There are some other ISA cards that are also very similar.
Trident 9000 is definitely not good.