VOGONS


Pentium 4 1.6 GHz vs Celeron 2.0 GHz

Topic actions

Reply 20 of 22, by Arctic

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I guess the intended purposes were mostly office work (spreadsheads, word processing), multimedia and internet browsing.

As far as I know small caches are most noticeable in 3D applications.
Maybe it has to do with the amount of FPU calculations involved.

Reply 21 of 22, by Tetrium

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
F2bnp wrote:

It's not really the bus that kills it though, but rather the L2 cache.

So you reckon a Northwood Celeron running at 2.8GHz and 800MHz FSB will still perform crappy?
Gah, was hoping to put that ES to some use at some time 😵

Whats missing in your collections?
My retro rigs (old topic)
Interesting Vogons threads (links to Vogonswiki)
Report spammers here!

Reply 22 of 22, by ODwilly

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
dr.zeissler wrote:

Thx 😀 I thought about an Radeon 8500 AGP too.

I just wanted to mention that I have a laptop running a 1.8ghz Northwood P4 and a 64mb Radeon 8500. It plays Quake iii on max settings at 1024x768 really really well. Actually it even makes a good web browser running XP. So The Radeon would def be a good pairing.

Main pc: Asus ROG 17. R9 5900HX, RTX 3070m, 16gb ddr4 3200, 1tb NVME.
Retro PC: Soyo P4S Dragon, 3gb ddr 266, 120gb Maxtor, Geforce Fx 5950 Ultra, SB Live! 5.1