VOGONS


Reply 20 of 24, by leileilol

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Snayperskaya wrote:
noshutdown wrote:
leileilol wrote:

Had we already forgotten about Retrozilla? 🙁

yeah but does it perform better than the three? and does it run on 486?

Surfing on a 486 would be a interesting experience. Very frustrating, but interesting. 🤣

A more serious interaction with the modern web from a 486 would need a proxy and another computer to feed images/secure data/etc back and forth, probably as a jpg/gif imagemap.

apsosig.png
long live PCem

Reply 21 of 24, by ibm5155

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

On The time that I used browsers with pmmx 233
IE was faster, not 100% compatible but ok.
Firefox was a rock slow but it worked with every website
Opera was even slower than Firefox D:

I remember I tried to open Firefox, it actually worked well, but hell, when I pressed the search button, more than 10 minutes to load ;--;

Reply 23 of 24, by BSA Starfire

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Retrozilla 1.1 works pretty well for me on AMD K6-2 450 with 256MB RAM & AMD Duron 650 with 512MB RAM under windows ME, don't think you'll find anything better to be honest, at least not till Retrozilla Ver2. Before that I used Seamonkey, that was great but was left behind, retrozilla is I believe a follow on.

Best,
Chris

286 20MHz,1MB RAM,Trident 8900B 1MB, Conner CFA-170A.SB 1350B
386SX 33MHz,ULSI 387,4MB Ram,OAK OTI077 1MB. Seagate ST1144A, MS WSS audio
Amstrad PC 9486i, DX/2 66, 16 MB RAM, Cirrus SVGA,Win 95,SB 16
Cyrix MII 333,128MB,SiS 6326 H0 rev,ESS 1869,Win ME

Reply 24 of 24, by gdjacobs

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I have a problem with Retrozilla not having any up to date CA certificates. Is there a recommended fix?

All hail the Great Capacitor Brand Finder