VOGONS


First post, by TheAbandonwareGuy

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I've been fooling around with my EVGA GTX260 Core216. Its the 55nm revision. I got some (at least i believe) very impressive results on the Shader clock, memory was decent, core was around average on where it topped out. This is on the stock air cooler with no extra voltage

Here's the stock MHZ for my card:

CORE: 576
SHADER: 1242
MEMORY: 999

And here's my overclock:

CORE: 715MHZ (+139 mhz. Seems to be about average for this card.
SHADER: 1750MHZ (+508 mhz.... I can't find references to a card of this model breaking the 1600 barrier much less the 1700. and the next fastest was on water)
MEMORY: 1250MHZ (+251 mhz. Seems to be decent. There are reports of some hitting 1300MHZ which is the absolute max)

I can do some benchs and post the results if you want. I tested it using Unigine Tropics.

Techpowerup database to my card: https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/b2243/evga- … tx-260-core-216
Unigine Tropics Score HTML Result File: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AHSqiCmFW … F7zmA_H828/edit

Cyb3rst0rms Retro Hardware Warzone: https://discord.gg/jK8uvR4c
I used to own over 160 graphics card, I've since recovered from graphics card addiction

Reply 1 of 5, by sunaiac

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

How is your shader clock not 2x your core clock ?

R9 3900X/X470 Taichi/32GB 3600CL15/5700XT AE/Marantz PM7005
i7 980X/R9 290X/X-Fi titanium | FX-57/X1950XTX/Audigy 2ZS
Athlon 1000T Slot A/GeForce 3/AWE64G | K5 PR 200/ET6000/AWE32
Ppro 200 1M/Voodoo 3 2000/AWE 32 | iDX4 100/S3 864 VLB/SB16

Reply 2 of 5, by SPBHM

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
sunaiac wrote:

How is your shader clock not 2x your core clock ?

I remember softwares allowing you to control it independently on my 8600 and 9600GT
they could reach some pretty high clocks as well (around 1.8GHz for the 9600 I think)

Reply 3 of 5, by nforce4max

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I've done that much on a GTX 280 with the stock cooler, card held up well until the coils started to give out. I miss those days and the overclocking was much more fun than it is now, hell I even did 2.1ghz on a 9800GTX+. Now days we got these silly limiters that take out all the fun. 🙁

The lack of anyone doing any good hardware mods these days is depressing and most people now days don't know how to do the most basic of cooling mods.

On a far away planet reading your posts in the year 10,191.

Reply 4 of 5, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
nforce4max wrote:

I've done that much on a GTX 280 with the stock cooler, card held up well until the coils started to give out. I miss those days and the overclocking was much more fun than it is now, hell I even did 2.1ghz on a 9800GTX+. Now days we got these silly limiters that take out all the fun. 🙁

The lack of anyone doing any good hardware mods these days is depressing and most people now days don't know how to do the most basic of cooling mods.

Well thats not true, but those that still do are doing it for world records and such. For the average person there really isn't a need to anymore. For the average gamer all he really needs

720p core i5/GTX660 or better
1080p Core i5/GTX770 or better
1440p Core i7/GTX780Ti/GTX970 or better
4k Core i7/GTX980 Ti/SLI GTX 970 or better

Right now the hardware is so fast overclocking isn't really required anymore, and the fact that for instance with a xeon Quad core that might as well be a Q9650 and a GTX480 I can play any game I want at 1080p and at most run some at medium that means 6 year old parts are viable, and heck for 720p you could still get away with an 8800GT with a core 2 duo if your ok with medium/low.

Reply 5 of 5, by TheAbandonwareGuy

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Ok, Ran into an issue with my high OC: Crash's crysis. Blah i hate overclocking....

Cyb3rst0rms Retro Hardware Warzone: https://discord.gg/jK8uvR4c
I used to own over 160 graphics card, I've since recovered from graphics card addiction