VOGONS


First post, by melbar

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

It is possible to use a Athlon C (with default FSB133 (266DDR)) on a VIA KT133 mainboard (VT8363 & VT82C686A) ??

The official support by VIA is only 100Mhz front side bus. For memory bus it supports also 133Mhz.

If you have a mainboard with good bios Oc settings, for example the Abit KT7 (not the A version), in manual also user defined values are specified, so ~133Mhz FSB/ 33Mhz PCI overclocked with the KT133 should not be a problem right?

What is with the first boot before these changes will be set in BIOS? Is KT133 able to boot an Athlon C cpu?

#1 K6-2/500, #2 Athlon1200, #3 Celeron1000A, #4 A64-3700, #5 P4HT-3200, #6 P4-2800, #7 Am486DX2-66

Reply 1 of 6, by Tetrium

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

VIA KT133 worked just fine with Thunderbird B (it's kinda made for that chip), so I don't see why it shouldn't run the C fine also, provided your board can handle the unofficial 133MHz well enough or you underclock its FSB (making your C-chip run slower). If it won't run it, you can do the pencil trick to unlock its multi, but I have some vague memory that multi's above 12x on Thunderbird could be a bit problematic (there were some problems using the pencil trick and changing a Thunderbird 1400C into a Thunderbird 1400B).

I don't think I ever tried overclocking any KT133 boards though, as I always had plenty boards with a real KT133A at hand anyway.

Does your board have an ISA slot by any chance?

Whats missing in your collections?
My retro rigs (old topic)
Interesting Vogons threads (links to Vogonswiki)
Report spammers here!

Reply 2 of 6, by melbar

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Several weeks ago, i've destroyed one Athlon 1000 B cause i forgot the thermal grease. As a replace i've got an Athlon 1333 C with closed L1 bridges. That means, by default you are able to change multi's if the board has the option for.

Now my VIA family is these:
KT133, KT133A, KT333, KT400 and KT400A.

The point is, only the KT133's are time accurate, and my Gigabyte KT133A mainboard has no ISA slot, i've got the last days also a KT133 board, the Abit KT7 (which i have to test soon, maybe it works or not...).
The Abit has one ISA slot, and i thought maybe it's possible to run this cpu with 7.5x133 setting (default 10x133), also to change speed to reduce heat & power output.

Manual for KT7/KT7A:
http://www.motherboards.org/files/manuals/2/kt7a-raid.pdf

What i actually don't know is if it works. A simple test won't damage anything (chip and board) right?!

Edit:
I would prefer running an Athlon on FSB133. The performance to TDP ratio is quite better...

#1 K6-2/500, #2 Athlon1200, #3 Celeron1000A, #4 A64-3700, #5 P4HT-3200, #6 P4-2800, #7 Am486DX2-66

Reply 3 of 6, by Tetrium

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
melbar wrote:
Several weeks ago, i've destroyed one Athlon 1000 B cause i forgot the thermal grease. As a replace i've got an Athlon 1333 C wi […]
Show full quote

Several weeks ago, i've destroyed one Athlon 1000 B cause i forgot the thermal grease. As a replace i've got an Athlon 1333 C with closed L1 bridges. That means, by default you are able to change multi's if the board has the option for.

Now my VIA family is these:
KT133, KT133A, KT333, KT400 and KT400A.

The point is, only the KT133's are time accurate, and my Gigabyte KT133A mainboard has no ISA slot, i've got the last days also a KT133 board, the Abit KT7 (which i have to test soon, maybe it works or not...).
The Abit has one ISA slot, and i thought maybe it's possible to run this cpu with 7.5x133 setting (default 10x133), also to change speed to reduce heat & power output.

Manual for KT7/KT7A:
http://www.motherboards.org/files/manuals/2/kt7a-raid.pdf

What i actually don't know is if it works. A simple test won't damage anything (chip and board) right?!

Edit:
I would prefer running an Athlon on FSB133. The performance to TDP ratio is quite better...

I really can't tell. Whether you can run it safely @133MHz might also depend on how relatively recent your KT133 is (perhaps newer ones will do better, but honestly, I really don't know and wouldn't want you to take unnecessary risks for no good reasons).

Overclocking is always with extra risks, but if it's only a matter of stability (and if your board can run it), I'm pretty sure many boards have extra overclocking features, like raising voltages a little bit (not all boards have this though, but this was kinda common I think with earlier sA boards, I did the same tweaking with my A7V333 I think).

Perhaps someone with a bit more knowledge could chime in?

And yes, those sA's can burn up very easily like that, burned up a Palomino myself once within seconds, because I also forgotten TIM (I did install the CPU HSF though, but this chip was toast as soon as I tried to make it post like that).

Whats missing in your collections?
My retro rigs (old topic)
Interesting Vogons threads (links to Vogonswiki)
Report spammers here!

Reply 4 of 6, by Imperious

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

You cannot run a KT133 motherboard's cpu at 133mhz. According to all the reviews back in the day they topped out at 112mhz.

I have a Mobile Barton 2400+ running in my KT7-RAID at anything up to 2400mhz with a 100mhz fsb and 24x multiplier. You have to do a cpu socket pinmod
or run 2 wires to a switch to access the higher multipliers. See the following thread for more info.

Abit KT7A and Geforce 6600GT compatibility

Atari 2600, TI994a, Vic20, c64, ZX Spectrum 128, Amstrad CPC464, Atari 65XE, Commodore Plus/4, Amiga 500
PC's from XT 8088, 486, Pentium MMX, K6, Athlon, P3, P4, 775, to current Ryzen 5600x.

Reply 5 of 6, by melbar

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

What a pity! Would be bad that i can't use FSB133 with this KT7 board.

The manual of KT7/KT7-Raid/KT7A/KT7A-Raid, it's a manual for all 4 variants of these Abit boards, i've linked previous mail, there is at page 40 shown all the users defined setting.
You mean this is valid/available only for the KT133A chipset?

Attachments

  • user setting.jpg
    Filename
    user setting.jpg
    File size
    65.2 KiB
    Views
    457 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception

#1 K6-2/500, #2 Athlon1200, #3 Celeron1000A, #4 A64-3700, #5 P4HT-3200, #6 P4-2800, #7 Am486DX2-66

Reply 6 of 6, by Imperious

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

That's right, 133fsb only works on KT133A chipset boards. As I mentioned the only way to get higher multipliers is to mod the cpu socket. I doubt the fsb increase itself
does much for performance as the sdram even at 133mhz becomes a bandwidth restriction at higher cpu speeds. Over 2ghz on the cpu gives barely noticeable
improvements. I don't have a ATI x800 video card, but so far a Radeon 9800xt gives higher benchmark results than a 6800gt.
A motherboard with ddr ram support is what these cpu's need. But I enjoy running hardware on a motherboard that wasn't possible back in the day.

Atari 2600, TI994a, Vic20, c64, ZX Spectrum 128, Amstrad CPC464, Atari 65XE, Commodore Plus/4, Amiga 500
PC's from XT 8088, 486, Pentium MMX, K6, Athlon, P3, P4, 775, to current Ryzen 5600x.