look at this:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/overclock … uide,15-10.html

Good read.

I'm curious to know if my chip is rebadged to satisfy the market demand for the P75 then.. But even for something like a ~P90-P100 these finding are quite a bit above the normal results.

That is an oddly good result. I wonder if it's a rebadged P133?

I didn't know Intel did that at the time, but then, they were often kinda secretive, so who knows?

That is my current assumption too.
An interesting read talking about the same concept:
http://dfarq.homeip.net/overclocking-pentium-75s/

One thing that really kind of blew me away, was how much better the Disk performance is after the fact. I'm assuming that being the FSB improvement and not the CPU itself.

Still, the one thing that leaves me underwhelmed on the machine is the CT65550.. Slow as balls, Wish I could Overclock that too.

I bet that did speed up the IDE performance. Some of that might be disk cache, too, since the memory is now faster. Also, if the UI goes wonky during disk access, even marginal improvements can make it feel a heck of a lot faster.

I agree, It looks a lot like on the second graph you see the IDE bus or the Drive itself being the bottleneck at around that ~91MB/s speed.
Where as on the first one I took, it give the impression of being all over the place for whatever reason.