VOGONS


First post, by amadeus777999

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

After a long seek & trial period I finally managed to get my "ultimate" Doom hardware together...

-LuckyStar LS486E/Rev.?
-32MB EDO ram(50ns - yes, overkill)
-Matrox Millenium II
-Am5x86/ADZ

well, everything's quite standard fare, BUT the cpu makes all the difference, as
it runs at 180mhz with 3.x volt at 60mhz fsb with the clock divider(JP19) set to yield a PCI clock of 30mhz

I tested the rig with Quake and it also survived without a hitch. I will install Windows and if it succeeds I'll let the system run a few hours under various tests, BUT we'll see.

Cache has been disabled as, even with a 12ns tag, it couldn't keep up with the 60mhz fsb and at (3-2-3) would slow down the system. If 66 are possible I'll update the thread again but I doubt it.

I'll give more info/comparison once I'm done with visualizing all the data I have collected, comparing UMC/SiS 486 systems(50,60,66,150,160,180 @ 33,40,50,60 fsb[1]) and Intel LX/SiS 50x Pentium66 ones. In theory many values but in reality only a few options can and will be dealt with. IntelDX - WT, IntelDX4 - WB and the handy Am5x86 are part of the regime. The Pentium boards will run a Pentium SX948 overclocked to 66. Latter will feature scores submitted by generous owners of Intel LX based boards I do not own.

Feipoa has done magnificent work already on a multitude of cpus so I'll keep my work short and niche'y.

Doom shareware 1.9, demo3, default.cfg/screenblocks 9 yields - 75.2fps
3DBench2 - 105.6 fps

[1] 60mhz fsb only SiS and maybe UMC IF the board is cooperative(one was, another wasn't). Not all variations of fsb and cpu clock, 24 in theory, will be benched or are of course even supported.

Attachments

  • BootScreen 01.jpg
    Filename
    BootScreen 01.jpg
    File size
    226.24 KiB
    Views
    560 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
  • SI.jpg
    Filename
    SI.jpg
    File size
    492.06 KiB
    Views
    560 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
  • NSSI Cpu.jpg
    Filename
    NSSI Cpu.jpg
    File size
    457.79 KiB
    Views
    560 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
  • NSSI Fpu.jpg
    Filename
    NSSI Fpu.jpg
    File size
    503.61 KiB
    Views
    560 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
  • View.jpg
    Filename
    View.jpg
    File size
    585.16 KiB
    Views
    560 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
Last edited by amadeus777999 on 2018-02-15, 18:06. Edited 3 times in total.

Reply 1 of 7, by amadeus777999

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Last but not least...

Attachments

  • Speedsys 00.jpg
    Filename
    Speedsys 00.jpg
    File size
    477.86 KiB
    Views
    539 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
  • Cachchk7 -t8.jpg
    Filename
    Cachchk7 -t8.jpg
    File size
    451.26 KiB
    Views
    539 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
  • Cachchk7 -t8 -w.jpg
    Filename
    Cachchk7 -t8 -w.jpg
    File size
    426.03 KiB
    Views
    539 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
  • DoomSW1.9 -screenblocks9- demo3.jpg
    Filename
    DoomSW1.9 -screenblocks9- demo3.jpg
    File size
    78.53 KiB
    Views
    559 views
    File comment
    Oh yeah!
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
Last edited by amadeus777999 on 2018-02-15, 15:17. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 3 of 7, by amadeus777999

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
kixs wrote:

You have some great results... I might retry my 486 MAX (one day) 😁

486 max

Excellent!
I will incorporate your results into the data collected thus far - if there are any updates to your scores, please let me know.

It would be awesome if you could re-run Doom shareware v1.9 on your turbo-clocked boards(Intel 133 + Amd150 + Amd180), demo3 + use "screenblocks 9" in 'default.cfg' and inform me how many realtics you got.

Reply 4 of 7, by kixs

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Didn't play with it after I made that post. But I'm planning to go after 200MHz (coming this spring to a theater near you 😁 )... have collected many AMD 5x86-133 cpus to do the test.

Requests are also possible... /msg kixs

Reply 6 of 7, by amadeus777999

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
The Serpent Rider wrote:

But can it run Crysis?

Thank "god", it can't.

Played around with 66x3 and 50x4. The cpu cooperates but the system just "fades" after some benchmarks. I will have to look up the voltage mod that Feipoa and another user on here "developed" and see if a voltage slightly above 4Volt may do the trick... but don't hold your breath.

On a more positive note, the system ran Winbench97 on demo mode for a few hours @180mhz and the standard 3.x Volt provided by the LS486E - impressive.

Unfortunately one would most likely need a 10ns tag to let the 60mhz bus roar at 2-1-2. All tests with a boatload of srams, 4 UM61256AK-12 among them, were futile... synthetic benchmark and then lights out.
I'll implant the cpu onto a UMC board and proceed with testing.

Attachments

Reply 7 of 7, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Nice to finally see an Am5x86-180 build. I have a cachechk memory read speed of 69.6 MB/s with a 66 MHz FSB.

What is your Quake 1.06 shareware score at 320x200 (not using Phil's bench pack)? I get 19.8 FPS in DOS with an IBM 5x86c-133/2x.

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.