VOGONS


First post, by sheath

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I've got a bug to build old PCs that I've been stalling on since my move last year.. I've troubleshot my old ATX towers I saved from the escape of Texas, in addition to my PIII / Slot 1 "99box" one is my old PC from 2007, final upgraded to an Athlon X2 6400+. The other is a full tower that has an Abit IS7 motherboard and a Pentium 4 something in it. Two of my three old PSUs died on the shelf, including the one in my formerly working 99Box. The PSU in the full tower Abit /P4 has blown caps, the other works for now in the X2 6400 machine. I spent Saturday transferring the PSUs from one case to the other until I got two working machines, the 99box and the Athlon X2 6400, both still have my old working Windows installs and files on their HDDs. I've got my old 98 ASUS P2B motherboard and a Celeron 300A or PII 400 to choose from, currently in the broken full tower. I've also got to troubleshoot 386sx system from '89 that my college roomate donated to me.

So far I've ordered two PCI Sata controllers and a new PSU. I just need to decide what I'm going to build in that full tower. I am debating ignoring the Abit IS7 and Asus P2B motherboards for now and just going for a Cyrix 686 build or an K6-2 build to offset my PIII / Slot 1 '99Box'. The purpose of the later would be to use my Ati All In Wonder 7500 for its video capture capabilities on old game systems, as I currently do not have a system I want to leave that video card set up in. The purpose of the 686 system would be to replicate my first Windows PC, complete with the Matrox Mystique that is currently unused or underused as a backup PCI card in the '99box'.

If anybody has read this far and is wondering why I wrote all of this out, I'm currently stumped on how I could organize all of this hardware to create decent benchmark and gaming systems for their respective eras. If I can get the 386 machine working, the Matrox ISA card in it blew a cap in spectacular fashion on my last power on, I'd like to know if the motherboard also supports 486, and I'd test everything gaming wise up to Doom just to see how it runs. Anything on the 3DO and PC would be fair game. For the 686 machine I'd go up to about 1998 just to see how far I can push it with my Matrox Mystique, M3D and Voodoo1 combo. The K6-2 would just be a comparison machine with the PIII / Slot 1 99Box, using everything I've got from the Riva TNT to the TNT 2 Ultra and Geforce 256 or even the Hercules 3D Prophet Kyro II, Geforce 2 MX and Radeon 7500, I haven't decided.

Some pics of the currently non working 386 machine:

P_20180803_224510.jpg
Filename
P_20180803_224510.jpg
File size
1.92 MiB
Views
1140 views
File comment
386sx Machine
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception
P_20180803_224753.jpg
Filename
P_20180803_224753.jpg
File size
1.25 MiB
Views
1140 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception
P_20180803_224608.jpg
Filename
P_20180803_224608.jpg
File size
1023.12 KiB
Views
1140 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Reply 1 of 6, by chinny22

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I'm not quite sure what your asking. If its just what games will work on what systems then.

Basically Dos gaming will work on anything with an ISA slot as PCI soundcards have pretty bad dos support.

Win9x gaming is more dependent on Video card. If the game supports Glide, you'll want a Voodoo card
If its Direct X/D3D then ATI or Nvidia cards are what your after.

Of course you always get the exception to the rules. Here is a list of games that demand specific hardware.
https://www.vogonswiki.com/index.php/List_of_ … sensitive_games

Reply 2 of 6, by sheath

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Oh, sure, I have the means already to tell what game runs better in DOS versus 98SE. What I would want to test is the performance of the various processors. What I think I am asking is whether I can build one machine that will span multiple generations of hardware in an historically accurate way. I think I've seen one youtuber who claims to have gotten a Super Socket 7 board to work as a 386, 486, K6-2+ and K6-3 system, mostly with down clocking I think. I might go for that if it legitimately runs at the speed of a 386, which I will be able to test once I've finished troubleshooting my 386 machine. Then if I can determine whether that machine can be upgraded to a 486DX I'd really be in business for benchmark comparisons.

Anyway, i'm just offering it up for discussion, I've already got tons to read and research on my lonesome but would love to add to the stack based on solid recommendations around here.

Reply 3 of 6, by sheath

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

For a minor update on the older PC troubleshooting, I've made progress. The new PSU came in but not the AT adapter cables. I've ruled the P4 A-bit IS7 motherboard dead. It won't post or even cause the speaker to beep with nothing hooked up. My good ole Asus P2B 440BX board is still going strong, as are both my Slot 1 CPUs. Using a PCI SATA controller I've installed Win98SE on the Samsung SATA drive that was left in this computer.

My Promise SATA300 TX2, Fastrack TX2300, and Sil3114 all have problems loading drivers in 98SE though. I'm hoping I won't have to track down something more expensive for this adapter.

My goal for this machine will be to see if I can underclock either my Celeron 300A or PII 400 to 100mhz and get reasonable gaming results comparable to an actual P1. I also intend to use it for my ATI AiW 7500, as I recall that card having superior video capture compatibility with Composite game console outputs.

-edit-

A couple of reinstalls of Win98SE later I was able to get the Sil3114 working with the drivers available here on Vogons, thanks all!

Last edited by sheath on 2018-08-12, 23:06. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 5 of 6, by sheath

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Yeah, I won't be tossing it. But I won't be recapping a full motherboard until I manage to spring for a desoldering unit. I've got a Jaguar CD Developer unit, a Sega CD Model 1 and a Game Gear ahead in line besides.

Reply 6 of 6, by sheath

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I've got three Slot 1 based Win98SE cloned Maxtor drives running finally. The good ole P3B-F kept the PIII 800e, Matrox Mystique, m3D and Monster 3D Voodoo1 selectable. I swapped out the GeForce 256 and put in the 3D Prophet 4500 Kyro II instead. Benchmark results in Quake 3 Arena, Final Reality, 3dmark99Max, 3dmark 2000 and 3dmark2k1 have been run already with no errors. Results will be collated and posted later, but overall this is very comparable to the GeForce 256 with the added plus of environment bump mapping support.

42311807_2197764983629431_1166925885425582080_o.jpg
Filename
42311807_2197764983629431_1166925885425582080_o.jpg
File size
451.42 KiB
Views
921 views
File comment
Benchmark Slot 1 mayhem
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Try as I did, for days, I could not get my new to me Guillemot Maxi Gamer Phoenix 16MB 3DFx Banshee AGP card to play with my original Asus P2B board. With the same cloned install of 98SE as the P3B-F system I could install a TNT 2 Ultra or the Geforce256, but this Banshee would freeze whenever I attempted to install drivers for it, or access the hard drive in My Computer or Explorer. This, of course, was after clearing all motherboard and video card drivers in safe mode and letting everything reinstall. So, the P2B gets to have a PII 400 and the GeForce 256 instead. So far I am shocked at how CPU dependant the 256 actually is. On the PII 400 its performance drops well below the Kyro II it formerly trounced in some areas with a PIII 500 system. As it is, a PII 400 Mhz and GeForce 256 would represent quite the out of reach financial burdon to my college spending budget back in 1999, so this will be the redubbed 99Box. Technically the PIII 800e and Geforce 256 represent the peak of 1999's PC hardware performance, but pragmatism wins then and it wins now.

42310170_2197765203629409_8259907505384062976_o.jpg
Filename
42310170_2197765203629409_8259907505384062976_o.jpg
File size
238.74 KiB
Views
921 views
File comment
Benchmark in the dark
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Finally, a new to me slot one system with a generic motherboard got the third Maxtor clone Win98SE treatment. This one had the Geforce256 long enough to have all my benchmarks run and is now running the Banshee just fine. Oddly, this system crashed with the Kyro II, so each system basically chose its card for compatibility reasons. Again, all old motherboard, video card, audio, etc drivers were painstakingly removed in safe mode before reinstalling all motherboard drivers. This system has the "benefit" of on board sound, which I disabled. So the GeForce 256 and Banshee will have the benefit of all benchmarks taken with no audio allegedly affecting performance. Then I'll install my spare Awe64 ISA card for some 3DFX Voodoo 2 era gaming.

39942270_10156768608450536_736957972143407104_n.jpg
Filename
39942270_10156768608450536_736957972143407104_n.jpg
File size
41.05 KiB
Views
921 views
File comment
Newest Addition, PIII 500
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Finally, another one of my recent acquired PCs happened to be an Athlon XP 2600+ with a Radeon 7500 already installed, a simple Windows XP cleanup job and swap with my All in Wonder 7500 restored to me the single best video capture solution I have ever tested for S-Video or Composite signals.

42058299_2191206124285317_5695916650780426240_o.jpg
Filename
42058299_2191206124285317_5695916650780426240_o.jpg
File size
408.54 KiB
Views
921 views
File comment
All in Wonder 7500 capture bliss
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception