VOGONS


First post, by aries-mu

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Hey guys,

EDIT: assuming the cards that will be installed [VLB and/or PCI svga and probably controller(s)] are able to hold 40 MHz without wait states, and
assuming one wants:
• to set the FSB at 40 MHz, stably
• to install an AM486 DX4-120 WB CPU set at 120 MHz
• no PCI or VLB slots wait-states or downclocking to things like 27 MHz or things like that
• a plain 40:40:120 PCI:FSB:CPU setting, stable
• non-waitstated double banked L2 cache (what type is the best and fastest?)
• non-waitstated FPM RAM (possibly 60 ns? if not, what type?)
EDIT: • a non-waitstated built-in IDEx2 controller running also at 40 MHz

What would the 2 choice motherboards be?

EDIT: what would great 40 MHz-stable VLB and PCI svga cards be, that are still great under DOS, including DOS games (let's say up to about 1995ish) and also under Windows 3.xx and Win games, same period?
I was thinking, an S3 805 or maybe an ATI Mach 32 should be great under both DOS and Win. Correct? Any different suggestion?

Thanks

Last edited by aries-mu on 2018-12-18, 14:40. Edited 3 times in total.

They said therefore to him: Who are you?
Jesus said to them: The beginning, who also speak unto you

Reply 1 of 13, by Tiido

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Motherboards are not very likely to be a problem, but getting the VLB cards play along can be. Neither of my VLB video cards (ET4000W321 and GD5428) work with 0WS at 40MHz bus for example.
Wait states on RAM will be unavoidable, there are no FRM (or EDO) sticks out there than you can run without them and no motherboard offers 0 wait accesses cycles anyway and that's one reason why plenty of cache is important. 50ns modules are likely fastest you can find. For cache you'll want to find some 10ns chips to use.
I'm not sure what chipset will have best perfromance and configurability. Intel ones will have worst memory performance, I'm not sure how SiS, OPTi and UMC stack up (or any other chipset maker).

T-04YBSC, a new YMF71x based sound card & Official VOGONS thread about it
Newly made 4MB 60ns 30pin SIMMs ~
mida sa loed ? nagunii aru ei saa 😜

Reply 2 of 13, by aries-mu

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Tiido wrote:

Motherboards are not very likely to be a problem, but getting the VLB cards play along can be. Neither of my VLB video cards (ET4000W321 and GD5428) work with 0WS at 40MHz bus for example.
Wait states on RAM will be unavoidable, there are no FRM (or EDO) sticks out there than you can run without them and no motherboard offers 0 wait accesses cycles anyway and that's one reason why plenty of cache is important. 50ns modules are likely fastest you can find. For cache you'll want to find some 10ns chips to use.
I'm not sure what chipset will have best perfromance and configurability. Intel ones will have worst memory performance, I'm not sure how SiS, OPTi and UMC stack up (or any other chipset maker).

Okay thanks!
I'm going to edit the question adding the assumption that the installed cards will be able to hold the 40 MHz

They said therefore to him: Who are you?
Jesus said to them: The beginning, who also speak unto you

Reply 3 of 13, by brostenen

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I have perfect stable VLB on my machine, using 40mhz FSB, and two VLB cards at 0 wait state. Now... I am running with an DX2-80 and not DX4-120. The last time I used a DX4-120, it would not run with the same VGA card in question, only with PCI, yet that was a different motherboard.

The card's that I am using is an S3-805-VLB (Spea Mirage) and the controller's that I have tried are a Pine-627-IDE and an Buslogic BT-445S VLB SCSI-Controller.

Don't eat stuff off a 15 year old never cleaned cpu cooler.
Those cakes make you sick....

My blog: http://to9xct.blogspot.dk
My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/brostenen

001100 010010 011110 100001 101101 110011

Reply 4 of 13, by aries-mu

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
brostenen wrote:

I have perfect stable VLB on my machine, using 40mhz FSB, and two VLB cards at 0 wait state. Now... I am running with an DX2-80 and not DX4-120. The last time I used a DX4-120, it would not run with the same VGA card in question, only with PCI, yet that was a different motherboard.

The card's that I am using is an S3-805-VLB (Spea Mirage) and the controller's that I have tried are a Pine-627-IDE and an Buslogic BT-445S VLB SCSI-Controller.

this is useful! Thanks!!

I wonder why the DX4-120 issue! The bus is exactly the same!!! 😕 😕 weirdnesses of the computer world

They said therefore to him: Who are you?
Jesus said to them: The beginning, who also speak unto you

Reply 5 of 13, by sunaiac

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I've done my tests on a mb1433 with a tekrzm dc680t disk controller and a tseng labs et4000w32p.

Also tested a hot419 and a 486sv2gx4 with success.

No knowledge of PCI boards except for the MB8433, which runs at 27mhz.

R9 3900X/X470 Taichi/32GB 3600CL15/5700XT AE/Marantz PM7005
i7 980X/R9 290X/X-Fi titanium | FX-57/X1950XTX/Audigy 2ZS
Athlon 1000T Slot A/GeForce 3/AWE64G | K5 PR 200/ET6000/AWE32
Ppro 200 1M/Voodoo 3 2000/AWE 32 | iDX4 100/S3 864 VLB/SB16

Reply 6 of 13, by aries-mu

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Thanks.
Lol I googled MB1433 and I found this ultrasonic sonar:
https://www.maxbotix.com/Ultrasonic_Sensors/MB1433.htm

So, are you saying that both the MB1433 (whatever it is), the HOT-419, and the 486S2vGX4 work finely at 40 MHz FSB, 40 MHz VLB, and RAM?

Thanks

They said therefore to him: Who are you?
Jesus said to them: The beginning, who also speak unto you

Reply 7 of 13, by amadeus777999

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

For Vesa Local Bus maybe try the GA-486VS - I had it running at 50 with 0WS and an AvanceLogic based gfx card.

For PCI maybe try the LuckyStar LS486E - I have it running at 60mhz with a 1:1 - fsb:PCI ratio although I wouldn't recommend it for 24/7 usage. The board seems to have lax timings when it comes to the PCI bus so it is very forgiving in regards to "abnormally" high clockspeeds.

A UMC based board features better speeds when it comes to the PCI bus, so maybe go with something like a GA-486AM/S, Shuttle HOT433 or a Biostar MB-8433-UUD.

If you want to have a PCI based SCSI card running then forget about very high PCI speeds as the card most likely won't work.

Reply 8 of 13, by aries-mu

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
amadeus777999 wrote:
For Vesa Local Bus maybe try the GA-486VS - I had it running at 50 with 0WS and an AvanceLogic based gfx card. […]
Show full quote

For Vesa Local Bus maybe try the GA-486VS - I had it running at 50 with 0WS and an AvanceLogic based gfx card.

For PCI maybe try the LuckyStar LS486E - I have it running at 60mhz with a 1:1 - fsb:PCI ratio although I wouldn't recommend it for 24/7 usage. The board seems to have lax timings when it comes to the PCI bus so it is very forgiving in regards to "abnormally" high clockspeeds.

A UMC based board features better speeds when it comes to the PCI bus, so maybe go with something like a GA-486AM/S, Shuttle HOT433 or a Biostar MB-8433-UUD.

If you want to have a PCI based SCSI card running then forget about very high PCI speeds as the card most likely won't work.

Wow such a summary, thanks!

Well, rather than pushing/overclocking bus frequencies very highly, my goal is stability and compatibility at the "odd" 40 MHz frequency.
Because usually motherboards support settings for the classical 25, 33, and 50 MHz, but not 40, sometimes there isn't even a jumper setting for 40 MHz.

The same applies to CPUs: supported almost universally are 33, 50, 66, 75, 100. When it comes to 120, many times there are no settings.

Or, if the motherboards support a 40 MHz FSB, most of the times it forces the PCI bus down to 27 MHz.

So, my ultimate goal is a Motherboard that fully supports the (and is stable at) 40 MHz frequency on everything: FSB, RAM, Cache, and bus slots, whether they are VLB or PCI.

Which of the ones you suggested would qualify?

Thanks so much again!

They said therefore to him: Who are you?
Jesus said to them: The beginning, who also speak unto you

Reply 9 of 13, by sunaiac

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
aries-mu wrote:
Thanks. Lol I googled MB1433 and I found this ultrasonic sonar: https://www.maxbotix.com/Ultrasonic_Sensors/MB1433.htm […]
Show full quote

Thanks.
Lol I googled MB1433 and I found this ultrasonic sonar:
https://www.maxbotix.com/Ultrasonic_Sensors/MB1433.htm

So, are you saying that both the MB1433 (whatever it is), the HOT-419, and the 486S2vGX4 work finely at 40 MHz FSB, 40 MHz VLB, and RAM?

Thanks

biostar mb-1433-uiv-a.
Yes they work well. Even 50mhz.
But I tried did only, not windows.

R9 3900X/X470 Taichi/32GB 3600CL15/5700XT AE/Marantz PM7005
i7 980X/R9 290X/X-Fi titanium | FX-57/X1950XTX/Audigy 2ZS
Athlon 1000T Slot A/GeForce 3/AWE64G | K5 PR 200/ET6000/AWE32
Ppro 200 1M/Voodoo 3 2000/AWE 32 | iDX4 100/S3 864 VLB/SB16

Reply 10 of 13, by amadeus777999

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Both the Shuttle HOT433 and the Gigabyte GA-486 AM/S drive the PCI bus fully or at 50% speed - it's a BIOS setting and can easily be changed(the BIOS for the HOT433 needed an update though).
The LS486E has a jumper(I think it's 19) which is not documented but similarly halves the clock-speed.

Never had a problem with these boards at 40mhz fsb and full PCI speed be it graphics cards or the IDE controller. You only have to get cautios from 50 upwards.

Again, test and experiment yourself.

Reply 11 of 13, by aries-mu

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
amadeus777999 wrote:
Both the Shuttle HOT433 and the Gigabyte GA-486 AM/S drive the PCI bus fully or at 50% speed - it's a BIOS setting and can easil […]
Show full quote

Both the Shuttle HOT433 and the Gigabyte GA-486 AM/S drive the PCI bus fully or at 50% speed - it's a BIOS setting and can easily be changed(the BIOS for the HOT433 needed an update though).
The LS486E has a jumper(I think it's 19) which is not documented but similarly halves the clock-speed.

Never had a problem with these boards at 40mhz fsb and full PCI speed be it graphics cards or the IDE controller. You only have to get cautios from 50 upwards.

Again, test and experiment yourself.

sunaiac wrote:
biostar mb-1433-uiv-a. Yes they work well. Even 50mhz. But I tried did only, not windows. […]
Show full quote
aries-mu wrote:
Thanks. Lol I googled MB1433 and I found this ultrasonic sonar: https://www.maxbotix.com/Ultrasonic_Sensors/MB1433.htm […]
Show full quote

Thanks.
Lol I googled MB1433 and I found this ultrasonic sonar:
https://www.maxbotix.com/Ultrasonic_Sensors/MB1433.htm

So, are you saying that both the MB1433 (whatever it is), the HOT-419, and the 486S2vGX4 work finely at 40 MHz FSB, 40 MHz VLB, and RAM?

Thanks

biostar mb-1433-uiv-a.
Yes they work well. Even 50mhz.
But I tried did only, not windows.

Great, thanks guys.

They said therefore to him: Who are you?
Jesus said to them: The beginning, who also speak unto you

Reply 12 of 13, by brostenen

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
aries-mu wrote:
brostenen wrote:

I have perfect stable VLB on my machine, using 40mhz FSB, and two VLB cards at 0 wait state. Now... I am running with an DX2-80 and not DX4-120. The last time I used a DX4-120, it would not run with the same VGA card in question, only with PCI, yet that was a different motherboard.

The card's that I am using is an S3-805-VLB (Spea Mirage) and the controller's that I have tried are a Pine-627-IDE and an Buslogic BT-445S VLB SCSI-Controller.

this is useful! Thanks!!

I wonder why the DX4-120 issue! The bus is exactly the same!!! 😕 😕 weirdnesses of the computer world

Yeah.... Dont know what and how... Anyway.
The machine that I have 2 VLB cards running in, are the one in this blog post I made some time ago.

https://to9xct.blogspot.com/2018/09/dextor-ta … -build.html?m=1

Don't eat stuff off a 15 year old never cleaned cpu cooler.
Those cakes make you sick....

My blog: http://to9xct.blogspot.dk
My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/brostenen

001100 010010 011110 100001 101101 110011