VOGONS


First post, by athlon-power

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

So, I'm pretty sure my Tabor III motherboard has decided not to work for some reason or another. I even tried it with a different HDD to no avail.

However, I have one more vintage machine- I had forgotten about it this entire time. My emachines etower 433i. Granted, it's not a very powerful PC in the slightest, with its integrated ATI Rage Pro graphics (no heatsink on it, either!) with 4MB of VRAM, and 433MHz Socket 370 Celeron. It has no AGP slot, but I'm thinking PCI for video.

I don't want to change the processor it uses, but I do believe the main bottleneck in this system is the graphics, gaming-wise. If I were to go this route, what would you recommend for time-accurate hardware that is cheap nowadays, but would do the trick with the PCI-only situation I'm in? I should mention that I will allow zero additional TNT2 M64 based video cards into my collection. I learned my lesson with those when I was first starting out getting GPUs for this project a while back.

I would do the obvious and go for a Voodoo 3 but with my budget I might as well just go ahead and build an entire new system, case and all, and use some parts I already have, if I were to be able to cough up that much money.

Where am I?

Reply 1 of 4, by ODwilly

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Geforce 2 MX series. Great compatibility, common, and fairly cheap.

Main pc: Asus ROG 17. R9 5900HX, RTX 3070m, 16gb ddr4 3200, 1tb NVME.
Retro PC: Soyo P4S Dragon, 3gb ddr 266, 120gb Maxtor, Geforce Fx 5950 Ultra, SB Live! 5.1

Reply 2 of 4, by Mister Xiado

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I acquired a new-in-box GeForce MX4000 card from a company that doesn't seem to exist. It was a long while back, but I think the card was barely $20. Quake doesn't run super well using it on my K6-2 300 system, but it's playable. Not that I've tuned the system, or have proper DOS installed.

b_ldnt2.gif - Where it's always 1995.
Icons, wallpapers, and typical Oldternet nonsense.

Reply 3 of 4, by weldum

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

the problem with a mx4000 or a fx5200 pci are the drivers, they're not optimized for such older processor
a good match is a tnt2 m64, a gf2 mx or even a sis 315 (through it doesn't support palletized textures = glquake looks wrong, and in some d3d games the textures seems to be of lower quality)

DT: R7-5800X3D/R5-3600/R3-1200/P-G5400/FX-6100/i3-3225/P-8400/D-900/K6-2_550
LT: C-N2840/A64-TK57/N2600/N455/N270/C-ULV353/PM-1.7/P4-2.6/P133
TC: Esther-1000/Esther-400/Vortex86-366
Others: Drean C64c/Czerweny Spectrum 48k/Talent MSX DPC200/M512K/MP475

Reply 4 of 4, by swaaye

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Ideally you would want to have access to Glide. It's lower overhead than D3D and OpenGL so you get more out of the slow CPUs. Plus, the late 90s games were all quite concerned with working well with the super popular Voodoo cards. Some games will look best on them.