VOGONS


FX 5500 on old Mainboard

Topic actions

Reply 20 of 25, by GuillermoXT

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

This is my RetroPc

Attachments

My Retrosystems:
PIII on GA-6BA running Win98SE
AMD K6 233 on GA-586HX with Win95
Tandon 286-8MHZ Running DOS 6.22 on XTIDE-CF
M326 486DLC + 4c87dlc (Dos+Win3.11)
ECS UM4980 AMD DX2 80 5V (Dos & Win3.11)

Reply 21 of 25, by The Serpent Rider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

What about the Matrox G400-500 series for pci?

Matrox G400 PCI doesn't exist. G450 PCI does exist and should work on any 430TX motherboard. At least I had no problems on few boards I have. Drivers are a bit too heavy for Pentium MMX or AMD K6 though.

How can I know if it's a Chinese card instead of original NVIDIA?

Some old brands like PixelView or BFG. They made FX PCI cards back when they were relevant and probably QA on old systems. GeForce 4 MX or Quadro FX counterpart in general. Those should work without problems.

I must be some kind of standard: the anonymous gangbanger of the 21st century.

Reply 22 of 25, by Repo Man11

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

"Comparing this machine to my other Socket 7, the gap in performance is pretty small. A Soyo SY5EMA, K6-2+ 550 @ 560 (5x112 MHz) 512 megs of PC133, and a Radeon 9200 AGP with 128 megs of memory. It actually gets a lower score in 3D Mark 2000 than the 128 meg 9250 SE PCI does in the Biostar board, and the 3D Mark 2001 score is only a few points higher (2,356 just now). With 768 megs of memory installed, it ran Windows XP a little better than the Biostar @ 500 and 256, but not much."

mb-8500ttd manual needed

"I'd rather be rich than stupid" - Jack Handey

Reply 23 of 25, by darry

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Repo Man11 wrote on 2020-06-27, 22:18:

"Comparing this machine to my other Socket 7, the gap in performance is pretty small. A Soyo SY5EMA, K6-2+ 550 @ 560 (5x112 MHz) 512 megs of PC133, and a Radeon 9200 AGP with 128 megs of memory. It actually gets a lower score in 3D Mark 2000 than the 128 meg 9250 SE PCI does in the Biostar board, and the 3D Mark 2001 score is only a few points higher (2,356 just now). With 768 megs of memory installed, it ran Windows XP a little better than the Biostar @ 500 and 256, but not much."

mb-8500ttd manual needed

It's not that AGP necessarily affords better performance than PCI, especially on Super Socket 7 , it's that finding good AGP cards (with 3D acceleration support) at a reasonable price is easier because they were more common in AGP by 1999/2000 and later . PCI was getting relegated to niche/low-end status .

EDIT: Not to say the AGP does not have a big bandwidth advantage over PCI, it's just that by 1999/2000 video card demands on bandwidth were just starting to saturate the PCI bus. Consequently, AGP was not absolutely necessary yet, but manufacturers were jumping on it for their higher end offerings because they were likely to be used in a high performance system and those all had AGP anyway .

Reply 25 of 25, by GuillermoXT

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
dirkmirk wrote on 2020-06-27, 23:52:

My geforce FX5500 is an Axel branded 128bit 256meg card.

So maybe thats the difference its not a chinese one?

Do you have a photo of that card?

My Retrosystems:
PIII on GA-6BA running Win98SE
AMD K6 233 on GA-586HX with Win95
Tandon 286-8MHZ Running DOS 6.22 on XTIDE-CF
M326 486DLC + 4c87dlc (Dos+Win3.11)
ECS UM4980 AMD DX2 80 5V (Dos & Win3.11)