VOGONS


Reply 20 of 25, by Horun

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Anonymous Coward wrote on 2020-12-27, 01:45:
pentiumspeed wrote on 2020-12-26, 17:19:
Minimum timing is 100ns for 10MHz 286, 12MHz to 25MHz means 80ns. […]
Show full quote

Minimum timing is 100ns for 10MHz 286, 12MHz to 25MHz means 80ns.

The 200ns to 120ns were appropriate for 8088/8086 boards.

Get another set of memory at least 80ns for your 386, but 486 really prefers 70ns for best timings.

Cheers,

Fast 286s were sold with 100ns RAM, they just used wait states, which were common practice at the time.
Have you ever seen an original 6MHz IBM AT? I could be remembering wrong, but I think those used 250ns DIP RAMs.

Yes ! I had a old PGA 6Mhz 286AT mostly all TTL Gigantic board once long ago and it had 180 or 200nS DIPS iirc.
Was the worst board in my collection...Hence the "I had", it was not worth saving even for histerical purposes 😀

Hate posting a reply and then have to edit it because it made no sense 😁 First computer was an IBM 3270 workstation with CGA monitor. Stuff: https://archive.org/details/@horun

Reply 21 of 25, by rmay635703

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Horun wrote on 2020-12-27, 02:29:
Anonymous Coward wrote on 2020-12-27, 01:45:
pentiumspeed wrote on 2020-12-26, 17:19:
Minimum timing is 100ns for 10MHz 286, 12MHz to 25MHz means 80ns. […]
Show full quote

Minimum timing is 100ns for 10MHz 286, 12MHz to 25MHz means 80ns.

The 200ns to 120ns were appropriate for 8088/8086 boards.

Get another set of memory at least 80ns for your 386, but 486 really prefers 70ns for best timings.

Cheers,

Fast 286s were sold with 100ns RAM, they just used wait states, which were common practice at the time.
Have you ever seen an original 6MHz IBM AT? I could be remembering wrong, but I think those used 250ns DIP RAMs.

Yes ! I had a old PGA 6Mhz 286AT mostly all TTL Gigantic board once long ago and it had 180 or 200nS DIPS iirc.
Was the worst board in my collection...Hence the "I had", it was not worth saving even for histerical purposes 😀

In the dark times (1997)
I salvaged a 4mhz-286 non-ibm compatible from the scrapper but could never get the motherboard to post or bring up video ended up re-scrapping it a few years later when I found the miniscribe drive was also dead as a door nail

In hindsight unfortunate

Reply 22 of 25, by pentiumspeed

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

IBM AT boards of three types, had around 150ns-120ns ram typically.

PS/2 50 had 120ns 1ws

PS/2 50Z ran 10MHz used 100ns for 0ws.

I had these boards at one point and knows this.

Cheers,

Great Northern aka Canada.

Reply 23 of 25, by Caluser2000

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
pentiumspeed wrote on 2020-12-27, 03:00:
IBM AT boards of three types, had around 150ns-120ns ram typically. […]
Show full quote

IBM AT boards of three types, had around 150ns-120ns ram typically.

PS/2 50 had 120ns 1ws

PS/2 50Z ran 10MHz used 100ns for 0ws.

I had these boards at one point and knows this.

Cheers,

IIRC the IBM 30 pin PS/2 simms are not compatible with other clone systems either. And vise versa without out modification.

There's a glitch in the matrix.
A founding member of the 286 appreciation society.
Apparently 32-bit is dead and nobody likes P4s.
Of course, as always, I'm open to correction...😉

Reply 24 of 25, by pentiumspeed

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Actually only one. PS/2 8550 up to pair of 512K simms for total of 1MB, some of them used right and left handed simms that has square aluminum cans.
This is one of handed pair:
https://www.google.com/search?q=ibm+512K+simm … =IFGFri7UZJ3utM

Not the 50Z which takes one 72pin dimm which is standard DIMMs with IBM type presence jumpers set. FYI: presence pinout are same for IBM and clones yet jumpers are different between standard and IBM type just reset the standard 1MB or 2MB DIMM presence jumpers to work in this PS/2 computers, requires easy soldering to move the SMD jumpers.

Cheers,

Great Northern aka Canada.

Reply 25 of 25, by Anonymous Coward

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
pentiumspeed wrote on 2020-12-27, 03:00:

IBM AT boards of three types, had around 150ns-120ns ram typically.

I had these boards at one point and knows this.

Cheers,

Well, you're at least correct about 150ns. I got confused because the piggybacked ICs had "250" in their part number.
ibmpcatram.jpg
Apparently these are rated for 150ns.

However, I have never seen 120ns from the factory in any of the ones I've owned (Type 1-3, and XT 286)

"Will the highways on the internets become more few?" -Gee Dubya
V'Ger XT|Upgraded AT|Ultimate 386|Super VL/EISA 486|SMP VL/EISA Pentium