VOGONS


First post, by vstrakh

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I've got the A-Trend motherboard that seemingly does not exist. I can't google anything about ATC-1010 version, and even the Wayback Machine's copy of the A-Trend web site does not mention it, jumping over from ATC-1000 straight to ATC-1020.

Looking at the photos on the The Retro Web I see ATC-1020 is very similar to the ATC-1010, with few tiny changes mostly related to making board cheaper - like unpopulated USB and PS/2 connectors or missing flash programming enable/disable jumper. It seems all jumpers carrying the same function are designated identically on both boards, and some are either missing or hardwired on the ATC-1010.
Unfortunately there are some difference that makes me wonder about its nature.

ATC-1010 has the jumper JP18, right under the COAST slot, on the left of the Base_CLK selector table (see pic attached).
I would assume it is related to the cache functionality, but that jumper is not listed in ATC-1020 manuals. The cache upgrade procedure in the ATC-1020 manual tells to disable the onboard TAG chip by removing JP17 that is present on both ATC-1020 and ATC-1010.

The earlier ATC-1000 looks different, it has 3-pin header for tag chip configuration, to select the size of the onboard tag (16k vs 32k) or disable it by removing the jumper.
ATC-1010 has 16k x8 tag chip onboard, and the COAST module I have has 32K x8 tag chip.
I would guess I should just remove JP17 to disable onboard 16k x8 Tag chip, and the chipset would rely on the COAST module's 32k x8 tag chip.

Still, what could be the JP18 function?

ATC-1010.jpeg
Filename
ATC-1010.jpeg
File size
1.16 MiB
Views
285 views
File license
Public domain

The ATC-1020 photo is here: https://theretroweb.com/motherboard/image/atc … 8d085316734.jpg

Interestingly, the DosDays photo of ATC-1020 (http://dosdays.co.uk/topics/images/atrend_atc1020.jpg) looks identical to my ATC-1010 (except the connectors are missing, and the JP5/JP6 are relocated), and it does have the JP18, which unfortunately is not described in the manual linked there.

Reply 1 of 2, by PC Hoarder Patrol

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
vstrakh wrote on 2023-03-05, 18:31:
I've got the A-Trend motherboard that seemingly does not exist. I can't google anything about ATC-1010 version, and even the Way […]
Show full quote

I've got the A-Trend motherboard that seemingly does not exist. I can't google anything about ATC-1010 version, and even the Wayback Machine's copy of the A-Trend web site does not mention it, jumping over from ATC-1000 straight to ATC-1020.

Looking at the photos on the The Retro Web I see ATC-1020 is very similar to the ATC-1010, with few tiny changes mostly related to making board cheaper - like unpopulated USB and PS/2 connectors or missing flash programming enable/disable jumper. It seems all jumpers carrying the same function are designated identically on both boards, and some are either missing or hardwired on the ATC-1010.
Unfortunately there are some difference that makes me wonder about its nature.

ATC-1010 has the jumper JP18, right under the COAST slot, on the left of the Base_CLK selector table (see pic attached).
I would assume it is related to the cache functionality, but that jumper is not listed in ATC-1020 manuals. The cache upgrade procedure in the ATC-1020 manual tells to disable the onboard TAG chip by removing JP17 that is present on both ATC-1020 and ATC-1010.

The earlier ATC-1000 looks different, it has 3-pin header for tag chip configuration, to select the size of the onboard tag (16k vs 32k) or disable it by removing the jumper.
ATC-1010 has 16k x8 tag chip onboard, and the COAST module I have has 32K x8 tag chip.
I would guess I should just remove JP17 to disable onboard 16k x8 Tag chip, and the chipset would rely on the COAST module's 32k x8 tag chip.

Still, what could be the JP18 function?

ATC-1010.jpeg

The ATC-1020 photo is here: https://theretroweb.com/motherboard/image/atc … 8d085316734.jpg

Interestingly, the DosDays photo of ATC-1020 (http://dosdays.co.uk/topics/images/atrend_atc1020.jpg) looks identical to my ATC-1010 (except the connectors are missing, and the JP5/JP6 are relocated), and it does have the JP18, which unfortunately is not described in the manual linked there.

According to v1.1 of the ATC-1020 manual, JP18 sets the sync SRAM size... you can get the full manual here https://www.elhvb.com/mobokive/archive/A-tren … 1020/index.html

p 10-11.jpg
Filename
p 10-11.jpg
File size
198.23 KiB
Views
261 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Reply 2 of 2, by vstrakh

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

So it seems this ATC-1010 is even earlier revision of ATC-1020, before they moved to a new designation.
The photo in v11 archive has "ATC-1020" sticker covering the silkscreen text on the board.
The JP5/JP6 location in v11 differs from ATC-1010, but that's totally unimportant. And the voltage regulator jumpers are still matching my board, while being different in the next ATC-1020 revision in v13 archive.

Thanks 😀