VOGONS


First post, by AlessandroB

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

keeping in mind that it would fit on both machines, just to make a few words... which of the two machines would you put it on and why?

Reply 1 of 13, by Joseph_Joestar

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Pentium because later DOS games like Doom and Duke3D run better on a faster CPU.

PC#1: Pentium MMX 166 / Soyo SY-5BT / S3 Trio64V+ / Voodoo1 / YMF719 / AWE64 Gold / SC-155
PC#2: AthlonXP 2100+ / ECS K7VTA3 / Voodoo3 / Audigy2 / Vortex2
PC#3: Athlon64 3400+ / Asus K8V-MX / 5900XT / Audigy2
PC#4: i5-3570K / MSI Z77A-G43 / GTX 970 / X-Fi

Reply 2 of 13, by Gmlb256

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

+1 for the Pentium, unless you're referring to the 60 MHz version which isn't that fast than the 486 in consumer software that were available at the time.

VIA C3 Nehemiah 1.2A @ 1.46 GHz | ASUS P2-99 | 256 MB PC133 SDRAM | GeForce3 Ti 200 64 MB | Voodoo2 12 MB | SBLive! | AWE64 | SBPro2 | GUS

Reply 3 of 13, by AlessandroB

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

just some info: 486 cpu available for use are: from sx25 to DX2/4, PoD83, AMD120, Cyrix 5x86. Not a slow 486.

My question arises from the fact that the card I'm testing is an SC-55 but in ISA 8bit format so I thought that its scope of use was much earlier than Pentium.

Reply 4 of 13, by Gmlb256

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

POD83 is a real Pentium CPU for 486 motherboards that can handle it properly. Otherwise, I suggest using the Am486-DX4 120 MHz or the Cyrix 5x86 which are the fastest ones.

VIA C3 Nehemiah 1.2A @ 1.46 GHz | ASUS P2-99 | 256 MB PC133 SDRAM | GeForce3 Ti 200 64 MB | Voodoo2 12 MB | SBLive! | AWE64 | SBPro2 | GUS

Reply 5 of 13, by Shponglefan

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
AlessandroB wrote on 2023-11-12, 14:49:

My question arises from the fact that the card I'm testing is an SC-55 but in ISA 8bit format so I thought that its scope of use was much earlier than Pentium.

Do you mean an SCC-1? An SC-55 is an external sound module.

Assuming you mean an SCC-1, it can function as both an internal Sound Canvas and an intelligent mode MPU-401 MIDI interface.

What system you install it in depends on what you intend to use it for.

Pentium 4 Multi-OS Build
486 DX4-100 with 6 sound cards
486 DX-33 with 5 sound cards

Reply 6 of 13, by AlessandroB

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Shponglefan wrote on 2023-11-12, 15:01:
Do you mean an SCC-1? An SC-55 is an external sound module. […]
Show full quote
AlessandroB wrote on 2023-11-12, 14:49:

My question arises from the fact that the card I'm testing is an SC-55 but in ISA 8bit format so I thought that its scope of use was much earlier than Pentium.

Do you mean an SCC-1? An SC-55 is an external sound module.

Assuming you mean an SCC-1, it can function as both an internal Sound Canvas and an intelligent mode MPU-401 MIDI interface.

What system you install it in depends on what you intend to use it for.

exactly it's the scc-1, I didn't remember what it was called. I intend to use it for games and being ISA 8bit I thought that the games that used it were mainly designed for older machines like the 386 and 486. Furthermore on the Pentium I have an AWE32 with the possibility of both loading the modules into the 30pin SIMs and using a wevetable. But the real doubt is whether the games for which the midi card is used are older and if they don't require a Pentium I would like to keep the correct period.

Reply 7 of 13, by Shponglefan

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
AlessandroB wrote on 2023-11-12, 19:03:

exactly it's the scc-1, I didn't remember what it was called. I intend to use it for games and being ISA 8bit I thought that the games that used it were mainly designed for older machines like the 386 and 486.

It's an 8-bit card because it's just an MPU-401 interface with the Sound Canvas SC-55 sound chips built-in. Earlier MPU-401 cards were also 8-bit, along with the subsequent MPU-401AT card.

Since it's a General MIDI compatible playback device, any game that supports General MIDI would work with it. Most General MIDI supported games were published from 1993 to 1996.

Whether you put it in a fast 486 or a Pentium really depends on the games you want to play and what sound options they support.

The main reason to put it in an older system would be for the intelligent mode MPU-401 interface and use with external modules like the MT-32.

Pentium 4 Multi-OS Build
486 DX4-100 with 6 sound cards
486 DX-33 with 5 sound cards

Reply 10 of 13, by TamaMan

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

On my 486 DX2 66MHz with a SCC-1 card, I need to slow down the bus clock speed from BIOS for some (mid 90s) games to sound OK: Re: Joystick and MIDI issues after upgrade to i486DX2. Don't know if this is a common issue or just my setup.

PS. The SCC-1 was released in 1991.

Reply 11 of 13, by AlessandroB

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
TamaMan wrote on 2024-01-19, 19:58:

On my 486 DX2 66MHz with a SCC-1 card, I need to slow down the bus clock speed from BIOS for some (mid 90s) games to sound OK: Re: Joystick and MIDI issues after upgrade to i486DX2. Don't know if this is a common issue or just my setup.

PS. The SCC-1 was released in 1991.

very interesting, it's almost the opposite of what some people told me, at this point I imagine that either your system is not very compatible or this card needs to be moved from one system to another as needed.

Reply 12 of 13, by dionb

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
AlessandroB wrote on 2024-01-20, 06:50:

[...]

very interesting, it's almost the opposite of what some people told me, at this point I imagine that either your system is not very compatible or this card needs to be moved from one system to another as needed.

It's not the computer but the longevity of the SC-55 as the most used synth for game music creation. It was the first General MIDI synth in 1991 and it basically stayed the default until MIDI music in games went out of fashion almost 10 years later.

1991 was 386-era, 2000 was Pentium 3 / Athlon-era.

Pretty obviously, an Athlon would be much too fast for a 386 game that didn't manage its own speed, and conversely no way would a 386 run an Athlon game.

The SCC-1 card you have is pretty rare (take a look at prices it sells for...) as the very issue you are facing was and is common: an external module like the SC-55 is much more practical than an internal card limited to one system. The SCC-1 was only sold in the early 1990s, by 1994 Roland had released Wavetable modules with the same synth on it (eg SCB-55) as that was cheaper for all concerned as it could be paired with either a Roland MPU401AT or with any other sound or MIDI interface with wavetable module. That said, the SCC-1 would still work in any system with an ISA slot, and as the synth is essentially standalone, it's not dependent on performance or software of the host system (although software using it can be, of course).