Reply 20 of 22, by doshea
- Rank
- Member
Yeah, it seems like the Wikipedia article does combine two fairly separate product lines (apart from the fact that C++Builder often included C++). Oddly though there are separate pages for Turbo C and Turbo C++! I suppose they're separated by how similar their names are, not by how similar the products are.
I just took a look at the readme.txt file from the free 5.5 compiler and it's definitely based on C++Builder, in case anyone had any doubts about what that Wikipedia page said.