VOGONS

Common searches


First post, by Cobra42898

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I've been around computers quite a while, but I could use a bit of schooling on the pros for different versions of windows. My experience went from 3.x on 286s to win95 on a 486, then a p3 1ghz with winme, then later 2000 pro. There are different things different versions of windows do well, like for example:

Win95 is great for 486s/early p1s, but if you want more than 2gb partitions you need win95b or win95c for fat32.
If you need USB support, win98se is far better than 95.
Win2000pro was probably the most stable os I've run.
What does xp do that 2000 doesn't? Do 2000/xp handle large amounts of ram better than the win9x? Sata? Max hd size limit? These kinds of things.

Around the time xp came out, I was the proverbial starving college student, so I never really got into it that much. I ran that p3 forever. Now I'm looking at what os to run on different systems I own and I'm trying to figure out what the limitations and capabilities of each are.

Is xp's benefit just added driver/device support? What else am I missing?

Searching for Epson Actiontower 3000 486 PC.

Reply 1 of 1, by weldum

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

windows 95 is for 486, pentium and pentium mmx
windows 98se is for pentium 2/3
windows 2000 for powerful pentium 3 or athlon xp
windows xp for everything else

at least that's what i think
the benefits of windows xp over its predecessors are better and newer driver support, stability, more software and hardware available, supports easily up to 3.5 gb of ram (limit depending on hardware installed) and supports more than just one core/thread in processors.

windows 2000 has many of these things, but nowadays is starting to lack some software support, most notably steam support out of the box, and also driver support for some better cards is reduced or nonexistant.

windows me, configured correctly works really good, and if you plan to run windows games (no dos) on that machine, is a solid performer. the thing is that you need to use the latest drivers, using vxd drivers or older wdm drivers will cause it to fail. using it with more than 1.5gb of ram will fail.

windows 98se is the perfect option if you want a 9x machine with usb AND DOS support, without dos i recommend ME, it has good support for hardware and software from it's era. more than 768mb of ram (without tricks) and the system will fail to boot.

windows 95 (i always use osr2.5 and don't install ie4) is perfect for pentium/586/486 machines that mostly run dos games, i recommend it over dos based file managers because it's easier to use and set up (at least from my perspective). i also recommend it when you need to use ethernet cards for file sharing and such. it makes life easier than using wfw 3.11 or lan manager in dos.

DT: R7-5800X3D/R5-3600/R3-1200/P-G5400/FX-6100/i3-3225/P-8400/D-900/K6-2_550
LT: C-N2840/A64-TK57/N2600/N455/N270/C-ULV353/PM-1.7/P4-2.6/P133
TC: Esther-1000/Esther-400/Vortex86-366
Others: Drean C64c/Czerweny Spectrum 48k/Talent MSX DPC200/M512K/MP475